Can Symmetry Simplify a Hard Resistor Network?

6 replies · 3K views · last reply
mooncrater
Messages
215
Reaction score
18
the question is , to find the net resistance across the points a and b as marked in the figure(attached).Here I think that the method of Symmetry should work . But I am not sure about it and moreover its not clear to me how to use it.

The Attempt at a Solution


Handwritten resistor network drawn on lined paper, rotated, with each resistor labelled R = 1 ohm in a boxed note; the network is a triangular lattice with terminals marked a and b at the corners.
Handwritten hand-drawn resistor network in a symmetric lattice-like arrangement with labelled resistors R, points a and b marked at the ends, and a note reading R = 1 ohm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was it foggy in your room when you took these pix? They're barely legible. :(
 
I can hardly see your diagram at all (this is bad form, by the way ... posting illegible diagrams and expecting people to be able to decipher them). Do you know about delta-Y transforms? I seem to recall that there is a trick to the pyramid construct and you are right that it involves symmetry but I don't remember for sure that there is and certainly not how to do it. Delta-Y transforms will give you a brute-force method for getting it.
 
Here's a depiction of the problem:

Triangular resistor network with corners A, B and C; a dotted blue vertical line runs from C down through the centre, with horizontal and diagonal line segments subdividing the triangle.


To begin with all line segments between nodes represent a 1 Ohm resistors.

By symmetry all points on the center-line (dotted blue vertical line passing through point C) are at the same potential if a potential difference is applied between A and B. So use that fact to recognize new parallel resistance opportunities. Hint: Don't be afraid to cut a 1 Ohm resistor into two 1/2 Ohm resistors in series.

The problem should reduce to something more tractable at least. Still may require an application of Delta-Y or other other circuit analysis methods, but it will be on a trivial circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mooncrater
I studied you post , actually i didn't understand the symmetry method , moreover i didn't know about delta star methods . So i searched about them , studied them , applied them(delta star) in the problem , and in 3 long(+hard) tries I DID IT . Thank you.
 
@mooncrater : The symmetry method relies on the fact that when separate nodes are at the same potential you can connect them together with a wire or remove components connected to both without changing the circuit behavior in any way.

The simplest case is that of a bridge circuit where the arms of the bridge are balanced and there is no potential across the "bridge".

Two bridge circuit diagrams side by side, each with a +10 V supply at top and ground at bottom; resistors of 300 Ω and 100 Ω form the arms, with nodes a and b across the middle, and the left one shows a red arrow labelled Δv = 0 between a and b, the right one shows resistor R between a and b.
These circuits have identical characteristics

No current can flow if there is no potential difference, so if there's a component on the bridge it can be removed. If there's no component there you can add what you want, even a shorting wire, and no change will occur to the circuit's operation. In the above diagram the placement of resistor R between the nodes a and b has no effect. Recognizing that two nodes previously thought separate can be treated as one can lead to new parallel component reduction opportunities, or serial reduction opportunities if you can remove a redundant component.
 
You need at most one delta-star transformation at the very end, everything else can be solved with parallel/series resistor simplifications (after using the symmetry).