I Can the Fourier transform be applied to moving averages with Python?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying the Fourier transform (FT) to signals derived from moving averages for analysis and backtesting. Participants question the effectiveness of using FT on lowpass filtered signals versus the original signals. The original poster clarifies their intent to analyze the Fourier transform of the original signal for better insights. There is a call for more specific details regarding the characteristics of the signals in question to facilitate more targeted assistance. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in defining the signals and the analysis goals.
herchell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would like to compare and backtest these signals by applying Fourier transform to the signals received from moving averages. I would be very pleased if you could share your opinions and suggestions on this issue.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Can you say more about "these signals"? What are their characteristics? And when you do a moving average on a signal, that is basically a lowpass digital filter that you are applying. Do you really want a FT (or FFT) of this lowpass filtered signal, or do you want to FT the original signal?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Can you say more about "these signals"? What are their characteristics? And when you do a moving average on a signal, that is basically a lowpass digital filter that you are applying. Do you really want a FT (or FFT) of this lowpass filtered signal, or do you want to FT the original signal?
I want the fourier transform of the original signal. Wouldn't that be more effective for analysis?
 
herchell said:
these signals
herchell said:
the original signal
herchell said:
the signals received from moving averages

:welcome:

Perhaps you could be a bit more specific about what exactly you have and what you want to do. Now we have to guess how to help you .

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and berkeman
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top