Can the Inequality of the Sum be Proven Using the Cube Root of -1?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical inequality involving the sum of cubes of variables constrained to be greater than or equal to -1. Participants explore the proof that if the sum of the cubes of these variables equals zero, then the sum of the variables themselves is less than or equal to n/3.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an assumption that if \( x_1,\,x_2,\,\cdots,\,x_n\ge -1 \) and \( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^3=0 \), then it follows that \( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i\le \dfrac{n}{3} \).
  • Another participant shares a solution that is noted to be similar to an official solution, suggesting a level of agreement on the approach taken.
  • A participant questions the choice of multiplying \( x^3 \) by \( \frac{4}{3} \), wondering if it relates to -1 being a root, indicating a search for deeper understanding of the reasoning behind this step.
  • Another participant echoes the previous question about the multiplication by \( \frac{4}{3} \), reinforcing the inquiry into its significance.
  • A later reply confirms that there is indeed a reason for the multiplication, but does not elaborate further, leaving the explanation open-ended.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants show some agreement on the validity of the problem and the similarity of solutions, but there remains uncertainty regarding the reasoning behind specific steps in the proof, particularly the multiplication by \( \frac{4}{3} \). The discussion does not reach a consensus on this point.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the variables and their constraints, but does not resolve the implications of these assumptions on the proof or the reasoning behind certain mathematical choices.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Assume that $x_1,\,x_2,\,\cdots,\,x_n\ge -1$ and $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^3=0$. Prove that $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^n x_i\le \dfrac{n}{3}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Interesting problem. Here is my solution.

It suffices to show that $\max\limits_{x\in [-1,\infty)} (x - \frac43 x^3) = \frac13$, since then we may estimate $$\sum x_i = \sum x_i - \frac{4}{3}\sum x_i^3 = \sum \left(x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3\right) \le \sum \frac{1}{3} = \frac{n}{3}$$ Note that for all $x \ge -1$, \[\begin{align}\frac13 - \left(x - \frac43 x^3\right) &= \frac{4x^3 - 3x + 1}{3}\\ &= \frac{4[(1 + x)^3 - 3(1 + x)^2 + 3(1 + x) - 1] - 3(1 + x) + 4}{3}\\ &= \frac{4(1 + x)^3 - 12(1 + x)^2 + 9(1 + x)}{3}\\ &= \frac{(1 + x)[2(1 + x) - 3]^2}{3}\end{align}\] is nonnegative, and equals zero if $x = -1$ or $x = \frac12$, proving the claim.
 
Thanks for your participation, in which your solution is almost the same as the official solution, very well done, Euge!
 
Euge said:
Interesting problem. Here is my solution.

It suffices to show that $\max\limits_{x\in [-1,\infty)} (x - \frac43 x^3) = \frac13$, since then we may estimate $$\sum x_i = \sum x_i - \frac{4}{3}\sum x_i^3 = \sum \left(x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3\right) \le \sum \frac{1}{3} = \frac{n}{3}$$ Note that for all $x \ge -1$, \[\begin{align}\frac13 - \left(x - \frac43 x^3\right) &= \frac{4x^3 - 3x + 1}{3}\\ &= \frac{4[(1 + x)^3 - 3(1 + x)^2 + 3(1 + x) - 1] - 3(1 + x) + 4}{3}\\ &= \frac{4(1 + x)^3 - 12(1 + x)^2 + 9(1 + x)}{3}\\ &= \frac{(1 + x)[2(1 + x) - 3]^2}{3}\end{align}\] is nonnegative, and equals zero if $x = -1$ or $x = \frac12$, proving the claim.
Is there any reason why we took 4/3 to be multiplied by x^3? I know it simplifies nicely after that. Is the reason because -1 will then be its root?
 
DaalChawal said:
Is there any reason why we took 4/3 to be multiplied by x^3? I know it simplifies nicely after that. Is the reason because -1 will then be its root?

Yes indeed, there is a reason:

My idea was to find $\alpha$ such that $x - \alpha x^3$ has maximum $\frac13$ at some point in $[-1,\infty)$, and $\alpha = \frac43$ accomplishes that. We would then have $x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3 \le \frac{1}{3}$ for each $i$ so that $\sum x_i = \sum (x_i - \frac{4}{3}x^3)$ must be no greater than $\frac{n}{3}$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K