MHB Can the Inequality of the Sum be Proven Using the Cube Root of -1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if the sum of cubes of a sequence of numbers, each greater than or equal to -1, equals zero, then the sum of the numbers themselves is less than or equal to n/3. Participants share their solutions, noting similarities with the official solution. A key point raised is the multiplication of x^3 by 4/3, which simplifies the equation and relates to the roots of -1. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical reasoning behind these steps. The problem presents an interesting challenge in inequality and algebraic manipulation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Assume that $x_1,\,x_2,\,\cdots,\,x_n\ge -1$ and $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^3=0$. Prove that $\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^n x_i\le \dfrac{n}{3}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Interesting problem. Here is my solution.

It suffices to show that $\max\limits_{x\in [-1,\infty)} (x - \frac43 x^3) = \frac13$, since then we may estimate $$\sum x_i = \sum x_i - \frac{4}{3}\sum x_i^3 = \sum \left(x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3\right) \le \sum \frac{1}{3} = \frac{n}{3}$$ Note that for all $x \ge -1$, \[\begin{align}\frac13 - \left(x - \frac43 x^3\right) &= \frac{4x^3 - 3x + 1}{3}\\ &= \frac{4[(1 + x)^3 - 3(1 + x)^2 + 3(1 + x) - 1] - 3(1 + x) + 4}{3}\\ &= \frac{4(1 + x)^3 - 12(1 + x)^2 + 9(1 + x)}{3}\\ &= \frac{(1 + x)[2(1 + x) - 3]^2}{3}\end{align}\] is nonnegative, and equals zero if $x = -1$ or $x = \frac12$, proving the claim.
 
Thanks for your participation, in which your solution is almost the same as the official solution, very well done, Euge!
 
Euge said:
Interesting problem. Here is my solution.

It suffices to show that $\max\limits_{x\in [-1,\infty)} (x - \frac43 x^3) = \frac13$, since then we may estimate $$\sum x_i = \sum x_i - \frac{4}{3}\sum x_i^3 = \sum \left(x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3\right) \le \sum \frac{1}{3} = \frac{n}{3}$$ Note that for all $x \ge -1$, \[\begin{align}\frac13 - \left(x - \frac43 x^3\right) &= \frac{4x^3 - 3x + 1}{3}\\ &= \frac{4[(1 + x)^3 - 3(1 + x)^2 + 3(1 + x) - 1] - 3(1 + x) + 4}{3}\\ &= \frac{4(1 + x)^3 - 12(1 + x)^2 + 9(1 + x)}{3}\\ &= \frac{(1 + x)[2(1 + x) - 3]^2}{3}\end{align}\] is nonnegative, and equals zero if $x = -1$ or $x = \frac12$, proving the claim.
Is there any reason why we took 4/3 to be multiplied by x^3? I know it simplifies nicely after that. Is the reason because -1 will then be its root?
 
DaalChawal said:
Is there any reason why we took 4/3 to be multiplied by x^3? I know it simplifies nicely after that. Is the reason because -1 will then be its root?

Yes indeed, there is a reason:

My idea was to find $\alpha$ such that $x - \alpha x^3$ has maximum $\frac13$ at some point in $[-1,\infty)$, and $\alpha = \frac43$ accomplishes that. We would then have $x_i - \frac{4}{3}x_i^3 \le \frac{1}{3}$ for each $i$ so that $\sum x_i = \sum (x_i - \frac{4}{3}x^3)$ must be no greater than $\frac{n}{3}$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top