Can the moon orbit be used as perpetual motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using the Moon's orbit to create a perpetual motion machine, specifically by harnessing the gravitational interactions between the Earth and Moon to generate energy. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical limitations of such a concept.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to create a perpetual motion machine using the Moon's orbit to turn a gear for energy generation, under specific conditions of the Earth-Moon system.
  • Another participant suggests that while tidal power is a renewable energy source, it is not truly perpetual, as it has limits and is subject to the eventual tidal locking of the Earth and Moon.
  • A participant explains that an orbit does not propel the orbiting object, emphasizing that orbits are a result of gravitational forces and that extracting energy from an orbit would lead to a loss of that orbit.
  • Concerns are raised about the consequences of extracting energy from the Moon's orbit, including the potential for the Moon to be pulled closer to the Earth, which would negate the idea of perpetual motion.
  • One participant clarifies that the orbit is a description of motion caused by gravitational forces, and adding external forces would alter the orbit itself.
  • A later reply notes that the Earth-Moon system's dynamics could change significantly over billions of years, particularly with respect to the fate of the Moon's orbit in relation to the Earth's rotation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the concept of using the Moon's orbit for perpetual motion is not feasible, citing various physical principles and limitations. However, there is a lack of consensus on the implications of tidal power and the long-term dynamics of the Earth-Moon system.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions of perpetual motion, the finite energy associated with orbits, and the eventual tidal locking of the Earth and Moon, which could alter the dynamics of their interaction.

Enniss
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'll attach a picture of what I mean but essentially I wanted to know if it was possible to (under circumstances where the Earth and moon do not change angle of rotation when orbiting the sun) create a perpetual motion machine using orbit as a means to turn a giant gear circling the Earth in order to create energy?
47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

If the answer is obvious I am sorry but I was just wondering about it and I don't follow physics very well

thanks

for some reason the IMG isn't posting so here's the link
https://gyazo.com/47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Enniss said:
I'll attach a picture of what I mean but essentially I wanted to know if it was possible to (under circumstances where the Earth and moon do not change angle of rotation when orbiting the sun) create a perpetual motion machine using orbit as a means to turn a giant gear circling the Earth in order to create energy?
47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

If the answer is obvious I am sorry but I was just wondering about it and I don't follow physics very well

thanks

for some reason the IMG isn't posting so here's the link
https://gyazo.com/47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2
That looks really expensive and impractical. Fear not, though, because we already have something that does the same thing: tidal power.

But please note that tidal power is considered "renewable" which is commonly presumed to mean "perpetual", but really isn't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill and anorlunda
An orbit doesn't "propel" the orbiting object. The object is just continuously falling and missing the ground :wink:

Every orbit has a finite amount of mechanical energy associated with it. Steal the energy from an orbit and eventually you don't have an orbit anymore, you've got two colliding objects.

At least @russ_watters ' tidal power offering has limits on how much energy can be stolen (it's a very big amount, but still limited). Eventually the (Lunar) tides will cease when the Earth's rotation becomes tidally locked with the Moon's orbit. The Earth will then always present the same face to the Moon. I wonder which hemisphere will inherit the Moon? Don't bother placing bets, the outcome won't be known for some billions of years.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: krater and davenn
Even if we could design and build such a device, it would slowly pull the Moon towards the Earth as it saps gravitational potential energy from the Moon. So no perpetual motion here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Apart from all the other problems, may I just object to the statement that, "the orbit propels moon."
An orbit is simply a description of where something goes. What causes it to go there are things like the force of gravity from the earth.
If you add other forces, such as pulling on a wire, then you will change the orbit. The orbit is a result, not a cause.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: krater, davenn and gneill
gneill said:
The Earth will then always present the same face to the Moon.

Only if the Earth-Moon system survives the death of the Sun.

BoB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K