I Can the same argument be used for both radians and degrees in the sine function?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argument
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
TL;DR Summary
angle argument of a sine function
Hello,
I understand that the sine function take an argument as an input and produced an output which is a real number between 1 and -1. My question is about the argument. I know it can be in either radians or degrees which are different units to measure angle. An angle is the portion of the plane between two lines that meet at a vertex.

For example, let's consider a function that takes the length of the side as input and calculates the perimeter of a square: ##f(x)=4x##. The output is correct regardless of the input being in feet, meter, inches, etc. However, the numerical output is different depending on the unit of ##x##.

What about in the case of the function ##f(x)=sin(x)## or ##f(x)=3sin(4x+30^\circ)##? If ##x## is in radians or degrees, the answer is the same...How is that possible? I am trying to explain this concept to a friend but I am convincing and clear.

thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If those are interpreted by a human, he can make the appropriate adjustment in his interpretation. If they are in computer code, then the computer language will insist that the input to sin() is in radians. If you want to use degrees, you will need to make the appropriate conversion of units: sin( degToRad * x_degrees), where degToRad = ##\pi / 180 = 0.0174532925199433##.
It is very common to see a mistake in computer programs where the input to the sin() function is degrees without the conversion. The effects are serious. A tiny change in degrees is interpreted as a change in radians, which is much larger.
 
I'm not a mathematician, but I think the sine function works on radians, a dimensionless number (radian measure is a ratio). Your calculator uses the Taylor series (or some other faster series:

sin(x) = x+ x^3/3! - x^5/5! ...

If your calculator takes the argument in degrees, it first converts to radians (rad = pi * (deg/180)).

EDIT: basically, what @FactChecker just said.
 
fog37 said:
TL;DR Summary: angle argument of a sine function

Hello,
I understand that the sine function take an argument as an input and produced an output which is a real number between 1 and -1. My question is about the argument. I know it can be in either radians or degrees which are different units to measure angle. An angle is the portion of the plane between two lines that meet at a vertex.

For example, let's consider a function that takes the length of the side as input and calculates the perimeter of a square: ##f(x)=4x##. The output is correct regardless of the input being in feet, meter, inches, etc. However, the numerical output is different depending on the unit of ##x##.

What about in the case of the function ##f(x)=sin(x)## or ##f(x)=3sin(4x+30^\circ)##? If ##x## is in radians or degrees, the answer is the same...How is that possible? I am trying to explain this concept to a friend but I am convincing and clear.

thanks!
The sine function in general mathematics is almost always has an argument in radians. That said, using degrees is quite common in engineering and mechanics problems.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top