Can the Universe Be Understood as a Two-Dimensional Model?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Futobingoro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a theoretical model of the universe that posits it is composed entirely of points (0-dimensional objects) and time. This model suggests that higher-order constructions emerge from 'time exposure' of lower-order objects, illustrating how shapes can be perceived as cross-sections in time. The conversation references the concept of a two-dimensional universe, drawing parallels to the 19th-century book "Flatland," which explores dimensions through the experiences of beings in a two-dimensional world. Participants debate the philosophical implications of this model and its relevance to understanding the nature of dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional theory in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of time exposure in theoretical models
  • Knowledge of philosophical implications of geometry
  • Awareness of historical literature on dimensions, specifically "Flatland"
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time exposure in theoretical physics
  • Explore the philosophical arguments surrounding dimensionality in works like "The Elegant Universe"
  • Study the historical context and themes of "Flatland" by Edwin A. Abbott
  • Investigate modern interpretations of 0-dimensional objects in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the intersection of geometry and the nature of reality.

Futobingoro
This is a model that describes a universe comprised entirely of points (0-dimensional objects) and time. The underlying mechanism of this model is very simple: any object is a collection of point-time constructions. A construction of a higher order can be accomplished through a kind of 'time exposure' of an object of a lower order.

Let me illustrate:

Think of one of the tail lights in http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/1807/1ld2.jpg .

Likewise, when a line is exposed to time its time exposure creates a rectangle.

And a rectangle creates a rectangular solid in time exposure.

A shape can therefore be thought of as a cross-section exposed to time.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7158/2gl4.png (time exposure is from left to right)

Note that, while a cube in our perception is the very unit of substance and form, it is nothing more than a point and some time in this model.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Umm...


What?!
 
When you mentioned a "two-dimensional universe" I was guessing at first that it only included spatial dimensions and not time. I personally don't believe dimensions exist in nature but is only a fabrication of geometry. Singularities gives us good intuition of this.
There was a book that I think was written in the 19th century called "Flatlanders" It tells of a story of beings living in a 2 dimensional spatial universe when a three dimensional sphere passes through their plane of existence.
I coudn't find it on Google and the only reference to it was made in a book review of the book, "The Elegant Universe" which is probably where I heard about "Flatlanders". The book is probably out of print and cannot be ontained used due to its age but I would imagine that some university libraries have it in stock
RAD
 
Futobingoro said:
This is a model that describes a universe comprised entirely of points (0-dimensional objects) and time. The underlying mechanism of this model is very simple: any object is a collection of point-time constructions. A construction of a higher order can be accomplished through a kind of 'time exposure' of an object of a lower order.

Let me illustrate:

Think of one of the tail lights in http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/1807/1ld2.jpg .

Likewise, when a line is exposed to time its time exposure creates a rectangle.

And a rectangle creates a rectangular solid in time exposure.

A shape can therefore be thought of as a cross-section exposed to time.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7158/2gl4.png (time exposure is from left to right)

Note that, while a cube in our perception is the very unit of substance and form, it is nothing more than a point and some time in this model.
What's your point? Looks like an oversimplified model that might be used say to illustrate some simple point in relativity but I don't see why it is in philosophy section.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K