Can u-substitution be described as a Jacobian?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jacobian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

U-substitution is a technique in one-dimensional calculus that facilitates effective variable changes, while Jacobian determinants serve a similar purpose in multi-dimensional calculus. The discussion establishes that u-substitution can be conceptualized as a one-dimensional Jacobian determinant, reinforcing the consistency between single-variable and multi-variable calculus. Additionally, participants shared methods for creating vertical dots in LaTeX, specifically using the commands \vdots for vertical ellipses and \ddots for diagonal ellipses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of u-substitution in calculus
  • Familiarity with Jacobian determinants in multi-variable calculus
  • Basic knowledge of LaTeX typesetting
  • Concept of matrix notation in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Jacobian determinants in multi-variable calculus
  • Learn advanced LaTeX commands for typesetting matrices
  • Explore the relationship between single-variable and multi-variable calculus
  • Investigate the significance of determinants in calculus transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and LaTeX typesetting, as well as anyone interested in the connections between different dimensions of calculus.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
So u-substitution is used to make an effective change of variables in one-dimensional calculus. Jacobian determinants are used to make a change of variables in two or higher-dimensional calculus. Can a u-substitution be thought of as a one-dimensional Jacobian determinant?

And on an entirely unrelated note, does anyone know how to make vertical dots in matrix? I was going to draw out the Jacobian determinant, but I couldn't figure that out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can think of it as the determinant of a 1x1 Jacobian matrix if you want. But apart from telling you that single-variable calculus is consistent with multiple-variable calculus, I'm not sure what that buys you.

does anyone know how to make vertical dots in matrix?

\vdots.
 
It's always nice to know that things are consistent between the two areas, though. Thanks!
 
Char. Limit said:
And on an entirely unrelated note, does anyone know how to make vertical dots in matrix? I was going to draw out the Jacobian determinant, but I couldn't figure that out.

What kind of "vertical dots"?? And did you type "matrix" instead of "LaTeX"??
 
micromass said:
What kind of "vertical dots"?? And did you type "matrix" instead of "LaTeX"??

Typo, and, well, ellipses, but vertical, not horizontal. Like this:

\vdots
 
Char. Limit said:
Typo, and, well, ellipses, but vertical, not horizontal. Like this:

\vdots

Did you just answer your own question?? :smile: Yes, vdots is the way to type vertical ellipses. And ddots is the way to type diagonal ellipses.
 
micromass said:
Did you just answer your own question?? :smile: Yes, vdots is the way to type vertical ellipses. And ddots is the way to type diagonal ellipses.

I got vdots from AlephZero above, and ddots from you! Now I can type out n-size matrices!
 
Char. Limit said:
I got vdots from AlephZero above

Oh, how did I miss that??

Also, don't forget hdots which is a nice way to type ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K