What if the Jacobian doesn't exist at finite points in domain of integral?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the existence of the Jacobian in the context of a one-to-one transformation of a 3D volume from variables (x,y,z) to (t,u,v). It is established that the Jacobian can fail to exist at specific points in the domain of integration, particularly when considering mappings such as (x,y,z) = (u^{1/3}, v^{1/3}, w^{1/3}). The Jacobian |(uvw)^{-2/3}|/3 is undefined at points where any of the variables equal zero. To handle such cases, the integral can be computed using improper integrals by dividing the domain into subdomains that exclude the singularities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3D transformations and coordinate systems
  • Familiarity with Jacobian determinants and their significance in integration
  • Knowledge of improper integrals and their applications
  • Basic concepts of multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobians in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about improper integrals and techniques for evaluating them
  • Explore examples of one-to-one transformations in three dimensions
  • Investigate the implications of singularities in integration domains
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of multivariable calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques involving Jacobians and singularities.

Mike400
Messages
59
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
We use Jacobian when there is change of variables. Is it possible that for a one to one transformation the Jacobian doesn't exist at finite points in the domain of integration ?
Consider a one to one transformation of a ##3##-##D## volume from variable ##(x,y,z)## to ##(t,u,v)##:

##\iiint_V dx\ dy\ dz=\int_{v_1}^{v_2}\int_{u_1}^{u_2}\int_{t_1}^{t_2}
\dfrac{\partial(x,y,z)}{\partial(t,u,v)} dt\ du\ dv##

##(1)## Now for a particular three dimensional volume, is it possible that one or more of the partial derivatives of the Jacobian of transformation doesn't exist at any of the points in the domain of integration?

##(2)## If so, shall we compute the integral using improper integrals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider (x,y,z) = (u^{1/3}, v^{1/3}, w^{1/3}) for (u,v,w) \in D = [-1,1]^3. This mapping is one-to-one, but the jacobian |(uvw)^{-2/3}|/3 is not defined on \{(0,v,w)\} \cup \{(u,0,w)\} \cup \{(u,v,0)\}. The jacobian is however defined and integrable over the rest of D, a domain consisting of eight disjoint cubes of unit side. The results on each of these can then be added together.

If you want the jacobian to fail to exist at a finite number of points, then I would look at <br /> x = f(u) \cos w \sin v \\<br /> y = f(u) \sin w \sin v \\<br /> z = f(u) \cos v<br /> for u \geq 0, v \in [0, \pi], w \in [0, 2\pi) for which <br /> \frac{\partial(x,y,z)}{\partial(u,v,w)} = f^2(u)f&#039;(u) \sin v and choose f so that f^2(0)f&#039;(0) is not defined. One can envisage smooth functions which at a finite number of points behave locally in this fashion, although it may not be possible to give formulae for them. So far as actually evaluating integrals over such regions, I would split the domain into subdomains which each contain only a single coordinate singularity, which must correspond to a boundary of the subdomain in (u,v,w) space.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K