Can <UX, UX> be written (UX)H(UX)? - A Closer Look

  • Thread starter jumbogala
  • Start date
  • #1

Homework Statement

Is it true that <UX, UX> can be written (UX)H(UX)?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I think it is because <UX, UX> is equivalent to the dot product in the real case. The above would work (where H is T) if the situation was real.

It just doesn't actually say this anywhere in my notes or book, so I want to make sure I can use this fact. Thanks!
  • #2
What is your definition of <x,y>? (If it's an arbitrary inner product, then the statement isn't true. If it's a specific inner product, just use its definition to check if the statement is true).

Suggested for: Can <UX, UX> be written (UX)H(UX)? - A Closer Look