Can Vacuum Airships Overcome Structural Challenges for Feasible Flight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joes12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of vacuum airships, highlighting significant structural challenges related to maintaining a lightweight yet strong container. Participants emphasize that as the airship rises, venting helium or hydrogen must be carefully controlled to balance buoyancy and structural integrity. Previous discussions on the forum indicate a consensus that vacuum airships are currently deemed impossible without advanced materials, often referred to as "unobtanium." The need for rigorous calculations and structural analysis is underscored, with references to existing threads providing valuable insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles in aerodynamics
  • Knowledge of structural engineering for lightweight materials
  • Familiarity with gas dynamics, particularly helium and hydrogen behavior
  • Basic principles of vacuum technology and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research structural engineering techniques for lightweight materials in aerospace applications
  • Explore advanced gas dynamics and their implications for buoyancy control in airships
  • Investigate vacuum technology and its potential uses in airship design
  • Review existing literature on the feasibility of vacuum airships and related engineering challenges
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, materials scientists, and enthusiasts interested in innovative airship designs and the challenges of buoyancy and structural integrity in flight technology.

Joes12
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Are vacuum airships possible without unobtanium materials?
I was thinking about the vacuum airship concept that was conceived a long time ago. For example:



I think the main problem is the required structural strength of the container, and also being light weight.

I have not run any numbers, what do you think the potential issues with the following concept could be?

At ground level you start off with an airship with a lightwight rigid structure but it is filled with hydrogen or helium, so that the structure does not have to take all the load as if there was a vacuum.

As the ship rises, you slowly vent the helium/hydrogen in a controlled way so that there is still boyancy but this is balanced so that the structural forces do not beome too great. I suppose you might also just be able to compress it for more control and reusability, but that might require a compressor that is too heavy - haven't done any analysis or calculations on that.

The fixed rigid structure means that the internal density is decreasing as you vent the gas. As the ship rises, you can approach a vacuum type condition without exposing the structure to excessive forces. After the gas has been released (as much as possible) the ship would remain in place. You could then intermittently turn on the compressors to maintain the condition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look at the bottom of this page, you will see a list of other PF threads on this same question. It has been discussed multiple times here on PF. Read those threads first, then if you still have questions, post again here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
They seem to be the same area of discussion, but I don't think the same question from what I have seen.
 
...the general.consensus from those past threads is that it is both impossible and a terrible idea.
 
Joes12 said:
Summary: Are vacuum airships possible without unobtanium materials?

I think the main problem is the required structural strength of the container, and also being light weight.
And one of those threads has exactly that calculation. I just checked, and it is still there.

Seek, and you shall find.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
11K
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
668
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K