Can Vectors Have Zero Magnitude with Nonzero Components?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of vectors, specifically focusing on the relationship between vector components and their magnitudes. The original poster seeks clarification on whether a vector can have zero magnitude while having nonzero components, and vice versa.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of having zero components and nonzero magnitudes, with some suggesting that nonzero components imply a nonzero magnitude. Others question the scenario of vectors canceling each other out, particularly in the context of movement in opposite directions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of vector components and their contributions to overall magnitude, while others are still seeking clarification and hints regarding the questions posed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the professor's assertion that magnitudes are always positive, and the original poster expresses confusion about the questions and their implications. The discussion also touches on the need for a deeper understanding of vector components.

kraaaaamos
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Vectors and Magnitude - Theoretical -- PLEASE HELP!

Homework Statement


1. a. Can a vector have a component equal to zero and still have nonzero magnitude? Explain.
b. Can a vector have zero magnitude if one of its components is nonzero? Explain.



Homework Equations



During lecture, the prof. mentioned that magnitudes are always positive.
There is nothing in our textbook that discusses magnitues equaling zero.

Plus, I have no idea what the question is asking.
: (


The Attempt at a Solution




I went to look through other physics websites on the net. And from what I understand . . .
If a vector has nonzero components, it cannot have a magnitude of a vector because the very fact that it has a nonzero component, already implies a nonzero magnitude.

If a vector has a magnitude of nonzero, then the magnitude must come from nonzero components of a vector?

I don't know if that's right . . . and if the explanation is sufficient? = S
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vectors can have zero magnitude. They just can't have negative magnitude.
 
I looked at the question again.

a) Yes. It can have a Y-component of zero and a non-zero x-component, which will equal to a nonzero magnitude. Therefore, a vector can have zero component, but still have a nonzero magnitude.

b) I'm not sure. Is the magnitude zero if someone travels 6m north, then 6m south?

Because in that case, it would be possible to have zero magnitude even if you have nonzero components, IF the nonzero components cancel each other out (like in the case where someone travels 6m north and then 6m south) . I don't know if that makes sense.
 
You would need two vectors to describe the path of someone walking north, then south. Once you add the two vectors, you're left with one vector, and you can determine the north-south component, the east-west component, and the up-down component (for 3D space). You can't have two north-south components for the same vector.
 
I have no idea what the answer is. Can you give me a hint for these questions:

1. a. Can a vector have a component equal to zero and still have nonzero magnitude? Explain.
b. Can a vector have zero magnitude if one of its components is nonzero? Explain.
 
You are correct on part a. For part b, you need a better understanding of what the components of a vector are. To put it simply, if you have a vector on a plane, its length along the x-axis is one component and its length along the y-axis is the other component. Now, let's say the length along the x-axis is 1.0 . Can the vector possibly have zero length?

Here's another way to think about it. If x, y, and z are the components of a vector, its length r is

r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)

because of the Pythagorean theorem. If r = 0, what are the possible values of x, y, and z?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K