Can Wally Whacko's Heat Engine Truly Achieve 92% Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chipM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thanks
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a set of physics problems related to thermodynamics, specifically focusing on heat engines, solar energy conversion, and specific heat capacities. The original poster presents multiple questions, including the maximum efficiency of a heat engine, the area required for solar collectors, and calculations involving the heating of ice to boiling water.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the maximum efficiency of a heat engine using the temperature difference between hot and cold reservoirs, questioning the need for absolute temperature scales.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the calculations for solar energy requirements and the necessary collector area, with some participants suggesting proportional reasoning.
  • In the specific heat capacity problem, participants discuss the stages of heating ice and the calculations involved, with confusion about temperature changes and the correct specific heat values.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, offering insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some have provided guidance on using absolute temperature scales and the need to consider multiple stages in the heating process of ice. However, there is still a lack of clarity on certain calculations, particularly regarding the solar energy problem and the specific heat calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the assumptions and definitions related to the problems, particularly in the context of specific heat capacities and the efficiency of heat engines. There are indications of missing information and varying interpretations of the problems presented.

chipM
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1)Wally whacko claims to have invented a heat engine that will revulutionalise the industry. It runs between a hot source at 300 C and a cold sink at 25 C . he claims that his engine is 92 % effieicnt.
What is the max efficiency of his engine ? in 2sf

(2)At a certain location the solar power per unit area reaching Earth suface is 200 w/m^2. Averaged over 24 hour day.
If the average requirement in your home is 3.8 kw and you can convert solar power to elevtric power with 10% efficiency, how large a collector area will you need to meet all your house hold energy requirement from solar energy.

(3)The soecific heat capacity of ice is about 0.5 cal/g C.
Suppose that it remains at that value all the way to absolute zero. Calculate the number of calories it would take to change a 0.90g ice cube at absolute zero ( -273 C) t 0.90 g of boiling water.
How does this number of calories compare with the number of calories required to change the same gram of 100 C boiling water to 100 C steam. ?


Homework Equations


1) t(h)-t(c)/ t(h)
i don't know number 2
3) q=mct

The Attempt at a Solution



1) 300-25 /300 = 91.667 so its 91.667% efficeint
2) idont know where to start
3) o.90 x -273 x 0.5= -122.850

are they right ? please correct me if i am wrong with proper working

thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chipM said:

Homework Statement



1)Wally whacko claims to have invented a heat engine that will revulutionalise the industry. It runs between a hot source at 300 C and a cold sink at 25 C . he claims that his engine is 92 % effieicnt.
What is the max efficiency of his engine ? in 2sf

(2)At a certain location the solar power per unit area reaching Earth suface is 200 w/m^2. Averaged over 24 hour day.
If the average requirement in your home is 3.8 kw and you can convert solar power to elevtric power with 10% efficiency, how large a collector area will you need to meet all your house hold energy requirement from solar energy.

(3)The soecific heat capacity of ice is about 0.5 cal/g C.
Suppose that it remains at that value all the way to absolute zero. Calculate the number of calories it would take to change a 0.90g ice cube at absolute zero ( -273 C) t 0.90 g of boiling water.
How does this number of calories compare with the number of calories required to change the same gram of 100 C boiling water to 100 C steam. ?


Homework Equations


1) t(h)-t(c)/ t(h)   What temperature scale is needed for this to be true?
i don't know number 2
3) q=mct

The Attempt at a Solution



1) 300-25 /300 = 91.667 so its 91.667% efficeint
2) [STRIKE]idont[/STRIKE] I don't know where to start    Oh please! This just requires some proportions and the cancelling of units.
3) o.90 x -273 x 0.5= -122.850

are they right ? please correct me if i am wrong with proper working

thanks !
Hello chipM. Welcome to PF !

None of your answers is correct.

For #3: Why the negative sign when the change in temperature is positive?
How many calories does it take to melt ice -- latent heat of fusion.

What is the specific heat capacity of liquid water?​
 
for liquid water its 4.18 i recon

i don't know about your other question though

how do i solve the other two questions ? please help me

thank you
 
For #1, use absolute temperature scale (kelvins).

For #2, start by finding how much solar power a solar panel has to consume to produce 3.8 kW at 10% efficiency.

For #3, ice goes from -273 to 0, melts, and then goes to +100.
 
thanks mate

so i have to convert the temparature for 1) to kelvinss ?

so for 3) i got -173 x 0.09 x 0.5= -7.785 joules

correct ?
 
chipM said:
thanks mate

so i have to convert the temperature for 1) to Kelvin ?
Yes, or °Rankine if you prefer.
 
SammyS said:
Yes, or °Rankine if you prefer.

cheers :)

so for 3) i got -173 x 0.09 x 0.5= -7.785 joules

correct ?
 
chipM said:
so for 3) i got -173 x 0.09 x 0.5= -7.785 joules

correct ?

Not even close. As I said, the ice goes through three distinct stages on its way from abs. zero to boiling water.
 
chipM said:
cheers :)

so for 3) i got -173 x 0.09 x 0.5= -7.785 joules

correct ?
The temperature changes are positive. Why do you show it being negative again? This time, you seem to have ice going from -100°C to -273°C .

As voko pointed out:
For #3, ice goes from -273°C to 0°C, melts, and then goes to +100°C .​
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
The temperature changes are positive. Why do you show it being negative again? This time, you seem to have ice going from -100°C to -273°C .

As voko pointed out:
For #3, ice goes from -273°C to 0°C, melts, and then goes to +100°C .​

k i am working on 3)

for 1) is it (573.15- 298.15)/ 573.15 = 0.48

which means its only 48% efficient ?
 
  • #11
chipM said:
for 1) is it (573.15- 298.15)/ 573.15 = 0.48

which means its only 48% efficient ?
Yes.
 
  • #12
SammyS said:
The temperature changes are positive. Why do you show it being negative again? This time, you seem to have ice going from -100°C to -273°C .

As voko pointed out:
For #3, ice goes from -273°C to 0°C, melts, and then goes to +100°C .​

hey man i still don't get how to do 2)

so is the temparature change 373 ?

which mean its going to be

0.5x 0.009x 373 = 0.168 .

yes ?
 
  • #13
chipM said:
hey man i still don't get how to do 2)
You state that you don't know how to do 2, then jump right into #3 without mentioning that's what you're doing ?
so is the temperature change 373 ?

which mean its going to be

0.5x 0.009x 373 = 0.168 .

yes ?
No.

The temperature increase is 373°C, but the first 273 of that is for ice. (You do know that the ice melts at 0°C, right?)

How much heat does it take to melt 0.90 g of ice ?

Then the liquid water requires yet more heat to raise its temperature to the boiling point. (100°C at 1 atmosphere of pressure.) As I said before, the specific heat capacity of liquid water is different than that of ice. (Do you know what it is?)

After adding all that, how does that compare to the amount of heat required to change 0.90 g of liquid water to steam ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
35K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K