Can Water be Lifted by Weight in Hydraulic Energy Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of lifting water using weight in hydraulic energy systems, particularly through a proposed mechanism involving elevated water tanks. Participants explore the concept of creating a continuous cycle of water movement without external energy input.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a system where water from an elevated tank flows into a larger tank and then is pushed back up to the elevated tank by the weight of the water, suggesting a potential for continuous energy generation.
  • Another participant argues that this concept resembles perpetual motion, which is not feasible according to the laws of physics, emphasizing that hydraulic energy systems rely on external energy sources, such as solar energy for evaporation.
  • A different participant suggests that understanding pressure dynamics is crucial, noting that pressure depends on water depth, which implies limitations in the proposed system's ability to function as described.
  • Some participants mention existing natural systems, like springs and pumping stations, that utilize gravitational forces and water flow, indicating that while nature employs similar principles, they do not result in free energy generation.
  • There is a reference to the historical context of water pumping systems, with one participant noting the longevity and efficiency of a local pumping station, suggesting that if free power from water were possible, it would have been widely implemented by now.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about the idea and acknowledges the potential for innovative energy solutions, while also recognizing the challenges and limitations inherent in the proposed system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of the proposed water lifting mechanism, with some asserting it is impossible due to the principles of physics, while others express curiosity about the concept without reaching a consensus on its viability.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on external energy sources and the limitations of hydraulic systems, as well as the challenges of achieving a perpetual motion-like system. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of energy generation and the need for practical applications.

Rand
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
water lifted by weight??

Well I was just roaming through some renewable energy options and came across hydraulic energy. I realize that this usually requires a dam, stream, river, and or a waterfall of some kind at the desired location and typically is used in larger applications.

What I was wondering is could it be possible to do it with water holding tanks? Tank 1 would be elevated higher with a minimum downward pitch being 25 degrees, the water travels down to Tank 2 which is significantly bigger and is already 3/4's full. As the water from Tank 1 begins to travel into Tank 2 it reaches full, a sensor is triggered and a valve opens in the bottom. The weight from the water pushes it back up to Tank 1 and you create a continuous cycle

Any insight would be greatly appreciated
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No, a continuous cycle with no net energy input would be perpetual motion, which we do not waste time discussing here on the PF. Hydraulic energy sources work in real life because thermal energy from the sun fuels the evaporation stage of the water transport.
 
Draw yourself a picture. It should be evident why this doesn't work.

Just make sure you get one basic point about pressure: pressure depends only on the depth of the water. With that fact in mind, you should be able to see that it is not possible for a tank of water to push water out the bottom and back up above its level.
 
I have seen some sites with a water spring on a hill, but yet the main source of water was below it. If it was the weight I thought perhaps you could copy what nature does but on a smaller scale.

I suppose even if you put solar pumps into the mix you are useing energy to create energy, there are ram pumps but too much water waste.

Anyway thanks for the insight, thought it would be a cool way to recharge a battery bank...Someone would have surely thought of it already though
 
I'm not really sure what you mean, but here is some info on how wells work: http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/gwartesian.html
 
Rand said:
I have seen some sites with a water spring on a hill, but yet the main source of water was below it. If it was the weight I thought perhaps you could copy what nature does but on a smaller scale.

I suppose even if you put solar pumps into the mix you are useing energy to create energy, there are ram pumps but too much water waste.

Anyway thanks for the insight, thought it would be a cool way to recharge a battery bank...Someone would have surely thought of it already though

What you have seen uses the motion of the water running down hill to pump a fraction of it uphill to where it needs to be.
 
A short walk from where I live the canal that served the stone mines runs parallel to the river. There is a lovely little pumping station that's been there since before the 1800's that pumps water from the river into the canal using the force of the river. It's been doing it for 200 years so has probably covered it's installation costs by now. I would have thought that if it was possible to create free power from water they would have done it by now.

This is the 3rd or 4th water based perpetual motion thread I have see in the last two months (not having a dig at you Rand, curiosity is what got Einstein where he is today... dead, hmmm maybe not the best analogy)
Is this common or are we in a post Christmas "I hate work and will now make my fortune by selling perpetual motion machines" type thing?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K