Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the possibility of having lower valued prefixes such as "deci," "centi," and "mili" for bytes in binary computing. Participants explore the implications of these prefixes in relation to existing binary prefixes and the smallest units of data storage.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants assert that bytes are the smallest unit of addressable storage, implying that prefixes like milli, deci, or centi cannot be applied since they represent values less than one byte.
- Others suggest that while traditional prefixes may not apply, there could be a case for millibytes in specific applications, such as data transmission rates.
- A participant mentions that the proper terms for binary prefixes are based on IEC standards, distinguishing between kibibytes and kilobytes, and notes that SI prefixes can also apply to smaller units than a byte.
- Some participants discuss historical context regarding the evolution of byte sizes and the reasons for using eight bits in a byte, referencing older architectures that used different bit configurations.
- There is mention of data compression techniques that involve fractional bits, indicating a context where parts of bytes are relevant.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally disagree on the applicability of lower valued prefixes for bytes, with some asserting their impossibility while others propose potential use cases. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the formal acceptance of such prefixes.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the lack of consensus on the definitions and applications of smaller units than a byte, as well as the historical context of byte sizes which may influence current terminology.