Can We Make a Summation Zero When Coefficients are Not Equal?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of making a specific summation equal to zero when the coefficients are not equal. The summation in question involves complex exponentials and is examined under various conditions, including the equality of coefficients and their potential values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if all coefficients are equal, the summation can be made zero by setting L to N-1.
  • Others argue that if coefficients are strictly positive, the summation cannot equal zero unless negative coefficients are allowed.
  • A participant points out that the presence of the imaginary unit "j" in the exponential function means that the function can take on negative values, challenging the assertion that the summation cannot be zero.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of k dividing N and how it affects the terms in the summation, proposing that if k is coprime to N, the terms can be reordered and manipulated to potentially achieve a zero sum.
  • One participant suggests using trigonometric identities and analytic expressions to explore solutions, emphasizing the need for specific values of variables and the generation of exact relationships between coefficients.
  • There is mention of the importance of avoiding all terms being zero, positive, or negative to maintain a variety of potential solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the summation can equal zero with unequal coefficients, with some asserting that negative coefficients are necessary while others highlight the role of the imaginary unit. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which the summation can be made zero.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the analysis may depend on the specific values of coefficients and the relationship between k and N, indicating that further exploration is needed for certain cases.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

I have the following summation:

[tex]\sum_{l=0}^Lb_l\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}kl\right)[/tex]

If

[tex]b_1=\cdots b_L=b[/tex]

then by making L=N-1 the above summation will be zero. Now, if the coefficients are not equal, can we make the summation zero, and how?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can unless the coefficients are allowed to be negative, since the exponential function can never be negative, thus it can never add up to zero.
 
cocopops12 said:
I don't think you can unless the coefficients are allowed to be negative, since the exponential function can never be negative, thus it can never add up to zero.

The coefficients are strictly greater than zero.
 
cocopops12 said:
I don't think you can unless the coefficients are allowed to be negative, since the exponential function can never be negative, thus it can never add up to zero.
The "j" here is the imaginary unit (called "i" by us ordinary "non-engineering folk) so your statement that "the exponential function can never be negative" is not true. For example, [itex]e^{j\pi}= e^{i\pi}= -1[/itex].
 
HallsofIvy said:
The "j" here is the imaginary unit (called "i" by us ordinary "non-engineering folk) so your statement that "the exponential function can never be negative" is not true. For example, [itex]e^{j\pi}= e^{i\pi}= -1[/itex].

That is right, j is the imaginary unit.
 
oh i didn't notice the imaginary unit, i tried some stuff with euler's identity, but nothing worked..

we will have to wait for what the experts have to say about this probelm
 
S_David said:
Hello,

I have the following summation:

[tex]\sum_{l=0}^Lb_l\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}kl\right)[/tex]

If

[tex]b_1=\cdots b_L=b[/tex]

then by making L=N-1 the above summation will be zero.
Is that always true? What if k divides N? Won't all the terms reduce to bl?
Now, if the coefficients are not equal, can we make the summation zero, and how?
Thanks
If k is prime to N then the [tex]\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}kl\right)[/tex] are just a reordering of [tex]\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}l\right)[/tex]. The sum can be rewritten as [tex]\sum_{l=0}^Lb_lω^l[/tex] where ω is a primitive Nth root of unity ([tex]ω=\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}a\right)[/tex], where a is prime to N). Choose any m, n s.t. |m-n| is not a multiple of N/2 (easy if N odd). Each ωl can be written as a linear combination of ωm and ωn with real coefficients. So except for the special case where |m-n| = N/2, you can specify all but those two of the bl and solve to make the sum zero.
I haven't investigated the case where k is neither a multiple of N nor coprime to it, but a similar approach should work.
 
S_David said:
Hello,

I have the following summation:

[tex]\sum_{l=0}^Lb_l\exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{N}kl\right)[/tex]

If

[tex]b_1=\cdots b_L=b[/tex]

then by making L=N-1 the above summation will be zero. Now, if the coefficients are not equal, can we make the summation zero, and how?

Thanks

Do you need any other constraints other than the coeffecients being different?

As long as you don't get all the terms being zero, positive, or negative, then you are going to have a lot of different solutions.

If you had to get some kind of analytic expression, then one way to do this would be to put it into cos(x) + i sin(x) form and then use trig identities to get things in terms of exact square roots. This would be done for specific values of your variables that are supplied.

From this you do the above until you get one-degree of freedom left and use the information to set the coeffecient so that the whole expression equals zero.

An example of the square root thing is say finding cos(5pi/6) = cos(pi/3+pi/2) = cos(pi/3)cos(pi/2) - sin(pi/3)sin(pi/2) = -SQRT(3)/2.

You could generate a decomposition routine to find an analytic expression given everything inside the exponential and thus generate an exact surd form for the exponential expressions which will give you an exact relationship between all the b's. This is if you need exact solutions. If you don't, then you can use numeric analysis to get solutions that are 'good enough'.

The key thing that you will have to do is generate the results for prime denominators (i.e. cos(pi/2), cos(pi/3), cos(pi/5), cos(pi,7) and so on. Once you have these, you can then generate the exact form of every cos(pi*Q) where Q is any rational number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K