Converting a summation into an integration

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amentia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on converting a summation in reciprocal space into an integration, specifically addressing the integration volume \( V_k \). The user presents the formula for the conversion and seeks clarification on the definition of \( V_k \) in the context of a Fermi gas, where it is determined to be the volume of the Fermi sphere. Additionally, the discussion explores the implications of using a delta function to restrict \( k \) to finite values and the subsequent need to redefine the volume, concluding that \( V_k \) should be \( 4\pi \) in the context of a two-dimensional volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of reciprocal space in physics
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Knowledge of Fermi gas concepts and density of states
  • Basic grasp of delta functions in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the density of states for a Fermi gas
  • Learn about the implications of rotational symmetry in integrals
  • Explore the relationship between \( V_d \) and finite volume systems
  • Investigate the use of delta functions in quantum mechanics and statistical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, as well as students and researchers working on problems involving reciprocal space and Fermi gases.

Amentia
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I want to convert a summation in reciprocal space and I am unsure about the integration volume. I have started with the formula:

$$\sum_{\vec{k}} \rightarrow \frac{V_{k}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int\int\int \mathrm{d}V_{k}$$

where:

$$\mathrm{d}V_{k} = k^{2}\mathrm{d}k \sin{\theta_{k}}\mathrm{d}\theta_{k}\mathrm{d}\phi_{k}$$

Here k can go from 0 to infinity, so what should be the volume ##V_{k}##?

My second question is when I perform the integration with a delta function which restricts k to a finite set of values, should I redefine the volume a posteriori?

$$\frac{V_{k}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\int\int\int \mathrm{d}V_{k}f(\vec{k})\delta(k-k_{0})$$

Here should we have ##V_{k}= k_{0}4\pi## or even a "2D volume" ##V_{k}= 4\pi##? While the volume was supposed to be already defined before we make use of the delta function.

I hope my questions are clear!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1: ##V_k## is the volume of the system. For a Fermi gas it would be the volume of the Fermi sphere.
Q2: Due to rotational symmetry, the preceding factor of your integral would become ##\frac{2\Omega}{(2\pi)^3}##. The 2 comes in if you have a Fermi gas(two energy states, spin up and spin down) the ##\Omega=4\pi## is the solid angle (scattering cross section) of the sphere of volume ##V_k##. Please see https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/3/67057/files/2018/09/density_of_states-vjqh7n.pdf for a detailed explanation.
 
Thank you for the document. In equation (10), they get rid of ##V_{d}## by defining the density of states. But what if it was defined wihout dividing by this volume? And then assume I have a real system with a finite volume ##V = L_{x}L_{y}L_{z}##. Can I relate ##V_{d}## to V? E.g. ##V_{d}=(2\pi)^{3}/V## so that I will have in front of my integral:

$$\frac{V_{d}\Omega}{(2\pi)^{3}} = \frac{\Omega}{V} = \frac{4\pi}{L_{x}L_{y}L_{z}} $$

where I have assumed that the function inside the integral does not depend on the angles?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K