Can we measure acceleration of galaxies and stars?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of measuring the acceleration of galaxies and stars, particularly in relation to the Great Repeller, an underdense region affecting surrounding matter. It is established that direct measurement of acceleration is not feasible for most astrophysical systems; instead, instantaneous velocity along the line of sight is measured, relying on modeling techniques. The virial model is commonly employed, which assumes a steady state configuration and utilizes the virial theorem to relate kinetic and potential energy. Discrepancies in velocity measurements compared to the virial theorem can indicate whether a system is expanding or collapsing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the virial theorem in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with gravitational lensing techniques
  • Knowledge of velocity distribution models in cosmology
  • Basic concepts of galaxy dynamics and structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the virial theorem in astrophysical systems
  • Explore methods for measuring galaxy mass through gravitational lensing
  • Study the implications of velocity distribution models on galaxy dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of underdense regions like the Great Repeller on cosmic structures
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and cosmologists interested in galaxy dynamics, gravitational interactions, and the measurement of cosmic structures will benefit from this discussion.

elcaro
Messages
129
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
We can (with increasing precission) measure distances of far away object in space, and velocities. But is there a method of measuring acceleration (so, in fact changes of velocity, or the time derivative of velocities) of far away galaxies.?
As for example we see a large void, the Great Repeller, which in fact is an underdense region, and with respect to this region, matter seems to be repelled by this region. The explenation for that is that matter outside that regions pulls on the matter inside it. But if that is really the explenation (attracation from surrounding matter, instead of repulsion from the center of that region) we would expect that closer to the center of that region, the acceleration falls down, whereas if there would be repulsion from this region, we would expect the acceleration to increase when going further to the center. But can cosmologists/astrophysicist actually measure accelerations?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The short answer is not for most astrophysical systems, not directly.

For the most part we can only accurately measure the instantaneous velocity along the line of sight. The rest comes from modeling. You assume some sort of average velocity distribution model for lots of objects, and then measure the line-of-sight velocities to fit the parameters of that model. If you get the model wrong, this can lead to biases in the imputed accelerations, which is one complication in interpreting data about galaxies and galaxy clusters.

A typical model that is used is a virial model: this one assumes that the object being observed is in a "steady state" configuration, and that its velocities can be described using the virial theorem. The virial theorem gives a relationship between the average kinetic and potential energy of a cloud of particles, and so by measuring their velocities, we get a measure of their kinetic energy, which tells us about their potential energy, which tells us about the gravitational field if the system is static.

If we have an independent way of measuring the mass of the system, such as gravitational lensing, then measuring higher velocities than predicted by the virial theorem may suggest the system is expanding over time. Lower velocities would mean the system is collapsing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: elcaro, ohwilleke, Bandersnatch and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K