B Can we measure acceleration of galaxies and stars?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of measuring the acceleration of galaxies and stars, particularly in regions like the Great Repeller, where matter appears to be repelled due to surrounding gravitational influences. Current methods primarily allow for the measurement of instantaneous velocities along the line of sight, with most acceleration data derived from modeling rather than direct observation. The virial model is commonly used, relying on the virial theorem to relate kinetic and potential energy in a steady-state configuration. However, inaccuracies in the model can lead to biases in inferred accelerations. Independent mass measurements, such as those from gravitational lensing, can provide insights into whether a system is expanding or collapsing based on observed velocities.
elcaro
Messages
129
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
We can (with increasing precission) measure distances of far away object in space, and velocities. But is there a method of measuring acceleration (so, in fact changes of velocity, or the time derivative of velocities) of far away galaxies.?
As for example we see a large void, the Great Repeller, which in fact is an underdense region, and with respect to this region, matter seems to be repelled by this region. The explenation for that is that matter outside that regions pulls on the matter inside it. But if that is really the explenation (attracation from surrounding matter, instead of repulsion from the center of that region) we would expect that closer to the center of that region, the acceleration falls down, whereas if there would be repulsion from this region, we would expect the accleration to increase when going further to the center. But can cosmologists/astrophysicist actually measure accelerations?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The short answer is not for most astrophysical systems, not directly.

For the most part we can only accurately measure the instantaneous velocity along the line of sight. The rest comes from modeling. You assume some sort of average velocity distribution model for lots of objects, and then measure the line-of-sight velocities to fit the parameters of that model. If you get the model wrong, this can lead to biases in the imputed accelerations, which is one complication in interpreting data about galaxies and galaxy clusters.

A typical model that is used is a virial model: this one assumes that the object being observed is in a "steady state" configuration, and that its velocities can be described using the virial theorem. The virial theorem gives a relationship between the average kinetic and potential energy of a cloud of particles, and so by measuring their velocities, we get a measure of their kinetic energy, which tells us about their potential energy, which tells us about the gravitational field if the system is static.

If we have an independent way of measuring the mass of the system, such as gravitational lensing, then measuring higher velocities than predicted by the virial theorem may suggest the system is expanding over time. Lower velocities would mean the system is collapsing.
 
  • Like
Likes elcaro, ohwilleke, Bandersnatch and 1 other person
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
Back
Top