Can we omit some words in colloquial conversation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conversation
AI Thread Summary
Words can be omitted in conversation, but the decision to do so depends on context and clarity. Certain types of words, such as adjectives or filler words, may be more easily omitted without losing meaning. However, the discussion lacks specificity, as it does not address particular classes of words or types of conversations where omissions might be appropriate. For a more productive dialogue, it's suggested to focus on specific examples or scenarios in separate threads.
fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Can we omit some words in conversation? And when and what words we can omit?
 
Science news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Can we omit some words in conversation? And when and what words we can omit?
Yes. All.
 
  • Haha
Likes phinds and berkeman
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
fxdung said:
Can we omit some words in conversation? And when and what words we can omit?
This is way too nebulous of a thread start. If you have some *specific* class of words (adjectives, etc.) or some *specific* types of conversations, please start a new thread. This one will stay closed.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Mark44

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

Is it permissible to omit words like "that" in relative clauses?
Replies
15
Views
2K
Etymology of the word 'fart' in a handful of PIE languages
Replies
4
Views
2K
"Bloody", a discouraged word to use in Britain
Replies
21
Views
6K
A Conversion of millicuries to Kilograys (?)
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Is Bohmian mechanics a convenient ontological overcommitment?
Replies
49
Views
4K
I Why do we use the word interpretation?
Replies
26
Views
3K
I Is the Idea of a Continuum Always an Approximation to the Physical?
Replies
5
Views
934
  • Poll Poll
Grammatically speaking, which would you consider more correct?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Is there a word for this? The means become the end...
Replies
20
Views
2K
Lingusitics Sounds of g and c in Romance languages (and some of English)
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top