Can we write mass in coefficients of elements in a chemical equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of a chemical equation in terms of mass, specifically whether it is valid to express the coefficients of reactants and products in grams rather than in moles or molecules. Participants explore the implications of mass conservation in chemical reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the chemical equation CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O can be expressed in terms of mass as 16g CH4 + 64g O2 -> 44g CO2 + 36g H2O.
  • Another participant agrees that expressing mass conservation in this way is correct but notes that it cannot be balanced without considering atoms and moles.
  • A later reply emphasizes that while the mass representation is acceptable, it lacks the ability to verify the correctness of the ratios without reference to atomic or molecular quantities.
  • Participants discuss the inability to determine the validity of mass-based equations without performing calculations involving moles and molar masses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that mass can be expressed in the chemical equation, but there is disagreement on the ability to balance such equations and verify their correctness without considering atomic or molecular aspects.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the inability to check the correctness of mass-based equations without reference to the conservation of atoms and the need for calculations involving moles and molar masses.

SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
Messages
119
Reaction score
13
let's take a chemical equation - CH4+2O2 ------> CO2+2H2O
From Reactant side- the coefficient of CH4 is 1 and the coefficient of O2 is 2
From Product side - the coefficient of CO2 is 1 and the coefficient of H2O is 2
we can write this chemical equation in terms of molecules,atoms,moles.
Can we write this chemical equation in terms of mass as-
16g of CH4 reacts with 2✕ 32g of O2 to give 44g of CO2 and 2✕18g of H2O.
So, can we write this chemical equation as- 16gCH4 + 64gO2 ------> 44gCO2 + 36gH2O
Please Help Me...
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
let's take a chemical equation - CH4+2O2 ------> CO2+2H2O
From Reactant side- the coefficient of CH4 is 1 and the coefficient of O2 is 2
From Product side - the coefficient of CO2 is 1 and the coefficient of H2O is 2
we can write this chemical equation in terms of molecules,atoms,moles.
Can we write this chemical equation in terms of mass as-
16g of CH4 reacts with 2✕ 32g of O2 to give 44g of CO2 and 2✕18g of H2O.
So, can we write this chemical equation as- 16gCH4 + 64gO2 ------> 44gCO2 + 36gH2O
Please Help Me...
Yes.
 
Yes, that's one of a correct ways of expressing mass conservation.

However, there is no way to balance such equation. When you write

CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O

you can easily check, that no atoms were created nor destroyed in the process. As we know masses of atoms (and/or moles) that in turn defines the ratio of amounts of reactants and products. When the equation is written using masses alone you can't check if the ratio is correct.
 
Borek said:
However, there is no way to balance such equation. When you write
If there is no way to balance such equation.
Would this chemical equation be correct -
16gCH4 + 64gO2 ------> 44gCO2 + 36gH2O
 
It is OK as written, but there is no way to prove it without thinking in terms of atoms and moles.

It is easy to check that

CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O

is OK - atoms (and charges, even if they are not listed) are conserved. Just count them on both sides of the equation.

It is also easy to show that

CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + H2O

is incorrect - there are two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom missing on the right.

But you can't tell whether

10 g CH4 + 33 g O2 -> 32 g CO2 + 11 g H2O

is OK or not, unless you do calculations using moles and molar masses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: diogenesNY

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
7K