Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the possibility of white dwarfs having iron cores, exploring theoretical scenarios involving supernovae, particularly core-collapse and failed-detonation supernovae. Participants examine the conditions under which white dwarfs form and the implications of different types of supernovae on their composition.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose that a white dwarf could theoretically form from a red supergiant that produces iron in its core, but this leads to complications due to the nature of supernovae.
- Others argue that a core-collapse supernova cannot leave behind a white dwarf, as the supernova is driven by the collapse of the core into a neutron star.
- A participant mentions that white dwarfs are primarily composed of oxygen and carbon, and not massive enough to create iron.
- Some participants clarify that the original question about core-collapse supernovae differs from discussions about failed-detonation supernovae, which may allow for the formation of white dwarfs with iron-rich cores.
- References to academic papers are made, suggesting that failed-detonation supernovae could lead to white dwarfs with iron-rich cores due to the re-accretion of material post-explosion.
- There is mention of the potential for collisions between white dwarfs in dense stellar environments to result in iron-rich core white dwarfs, which adds another layer to the discussion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express disagreement on whether white dwarfs can have iron cores, with some asserting it is impossible while others suggest specific scenarios under which it might be plausible. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views presented.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of supernova types and the unresolved nature of the mechanisms proposed for iron core formation in white dwarfs.