I Are White Dwarfs Stars? Understanding the Classification and Characteristics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamison Lahman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary
White dwarfs are remnants of stars that have exhausted their nuclear fusion, leading to debate about their classification as "stars." While traditional definitions emphasize active fusion as a criterion for being a star, many astronomers consider white dwarfs as part of the stellar category due to their historical connection to former stars. The ambiguity in defining what constitutes a star reflects broader challenges in astronomical classification, where terms often evolve based on practical usage rather than strict definitions. Discussions highlight that the classification of celestial objects serves to group similar phenomena for better understanding, rather than adhering to rigid definitions. Ultimately, the consensus among astronomers is that white dwarfs can be regarded as stars within the context of stellar studies.
  • #31
Puzzling, isn't it? IAU stands for "international astronomical union", which translates literally to "group involving many countries that is concerned with the laws pertaining to stars." You'd think a group like that would have a clear definition of what a star is, wouldn't you? But this is the whole problem-- cut-and-dried definitions are not actually very conducive to research efforts. Instead, what is effective is having a somewhat flexible working meaning of these terms. That's what flies everywhere except in the tests they give in elementary school classes, so beware of "authoritative definitions."
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ken G said:
Puzzling, isn't it?
Yes, that is why I asked.
 
  • #33
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/307414/pdf

"For objects this cool, the presence of lithium proves that they are substellar."

"Some of these dwarfs certainly are substellar but such a designation cannot be tied uniquely to any particular spectroscopic trait."

"Because some of these objects are substellar and thus not truly stars, the entire collection should be referred to as 'L dwarfs,' not 'L stars.'"

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608359.pdf

"3. Definitions:
(1) A “primary” body is a star or substar formed by core accretion from an
interstellar cloud, not by secondary accretion from a disk.
(2). A “substar” is a body with less than 80 Jupiter masses, the lower limit for
stellar hydrogen fusion."
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Yes, so none of that tells you if a white dwarf is a star. But as said above, the answer to that is, no if you look in a dictionary or encyclopedia, yes if you go to an astronomy meeting.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K