Are White Dwarfs Stars? Understanding the Classification and Characteristics

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamison Lahman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

White dwarfs are classified as stars despite being remnants of former stars and lacking nuclear fusion. The classification is based on their shared characteristics with other stellar objects, as recognized by stellar astronomers. Definitions of stars vary widely, often focusing on fusion processes, yet many astronomers include white dwarfs in their studies. The ambiguity in definitions reflects the evolving understanding of stellar classification, emphasizing the practical grouping of objects for scientific inquiry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar evolution and classification
  • Familiarity with nuclear fusion processes in stars
  • Knowledge of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram
  • Awareness of astronomical terminology and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the IAU's definitions and classifications of stars
  • Explore the characteristics of red giants and their classification
  • Study the properties and significance of compact stars
  • Investigate the role of stellar astronomers in defining stellar categories
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in the classification and characteristics of stars, particularly those studying stellar remnants like white dwarfs.

  • #31
Puzzling, isn't it? IAU stands for "international astronomical union", which translates literally to "group involving many countries that is concerned with the laws pertaining to stars." You'd think a group like that would have a clear definition of what a star is, wouldn't you? But this is the whole problem-- cut-and-dried definitions are not actually very conducive to research efforts. Instead, what is effective is having a somewhat flexible working meaning of these terms. That's what flies everywhere except in the tests they give in elementary school classes, so beware of "authoritative definitions."
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ken G said:
Puzzling, isn't it?
Yes, that is why I asked.
 
  • #33
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/307414/pdf

"For objects this cool, the presence of lithium proves that they are substellar."

"Some of these dwarfs certainly are substellar but such a designation cannot be tied uniquely to any particular spectroscopic trait."

"Because some of these objects are substellar and thus not truly stars, the entire collection should be referred to as 'L dwarfs,' not 'L stars.'"

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608359.pdf

"3. Definitions:
(1) A “primary” body is a star or substar formed by core accretion from an
interstellar cloud, not by secondary accretion from a disk.
(2). A “substar” is a body with less than 80 Jupiter masses, the lower limit for
stellar hydrogen fusion."
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Yes, so none of that tells you if a white dwarf is a star. But as said above, the answer to that is, no if you look in a dictionary or encyclopedia, yes if you go to an astronomy meeting.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K