Can You Calculate Matrix Inverses with Nilpotent Matrices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating matrix inverses involving nilpotent matrices, specifically focusing on the matrices B and A, where A is nilpotent (A² = 0) and AB = 0. Participants are exploring the calculations of expressions involving the identity matrix and the nilpotent matrix A.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the calculation of (I+A)(I-A) and the inverse of (I+2A). Questions arise regarding the appearance of the factor 1/4 in the expression for (I+2A)-1.
  • Some participants question the definition of the inverse of a matrix and how it applies to the expressions being discussed, particularly in relation to power series.
  • There is an exploration of whether matrices can be treated similarly to variables in calculus, particularly in the context of expansions and series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about matrix inverses and nilpotent matrices. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between matrix expansions and power series, although there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the solution manual's factor of 1/4.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the solution manual and express confusion regarding the definitions and properties of matrix inverses, particularly in the context of nilpotent matrices. There are indications of varying interpretations of the calculations involved.

songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395

Homework Statement


Let B = [tex]\left(\begin{array}{cc}2&4\\1&2\end{array}\right)[/tex] and A be a matrix satisfying A2 = 0, AB = 0

1. Calculate (I+A) (I-A), I = identity

2. Calculate (I+A)-1 (I+2A)-1B

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


1. Ans = I

2.
In the manual, it's written : (I+2A)-1 = 1/4 (I-2A)
I don't understand how 1/4 pops up...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of the inverse of a matrix? What happens if you tried plugging (I-2A) into the definition?


Incidentally, it's worth making an analogy with the power series for 1/(1+2a).
 
Hurkyl said:
What is the definition of the inverse of a matrix?
The inverse of a matrix A is a matrix A-1 such that AA-1=I

What happens if you tried plugging (I-2A) into the definition?
(I-2A) (I-2A)-1 = I...I still don't get it

Incidentally, it's worth making an analogy with the power series for 1/(1+2a).

power series of 1/(1+2a) = (1+2a)-1 = 1 - 2a - 8a2 - ...

What is the relation to the inverse?


Thanks
 
songoku said:
The inverse of a matrix A is a matrix A-1 such that AA-1=I


(I-2A) (I-2A)-1 = I...I still don't get it
songoku said:
power series of 1/(1+2a) = (1+2a)-1 = 1 - 2a - 8a2 - ...
Should be an alternating series, and the coefficient on a2 is wrong.
songoku said:
What is the relation to the inverse?
1/(1 + 2a) can be written as (1 + 2a)-1.

(I + 2A)-1 has a similar expansion. That's the connection.
songoku said:
Thanks

I also don't get what your solution manual shows for (I + 2A)-1; namely, the 1/4 factor. I think it's a typo.
 
songoku said:
The inverse of a matrix B is a matrix B-1 such that BB-1=I


(I-2A) (I-2A)-1 = I...I still don't get it
(I've changed the variable in the above to reduce confusion)

Sorry, I meant plugging in (I-2A) in for the "inverse of I+2A" -- i.e. B=I+2A and B-1=I-2A.

My mistake, though -- when you make the substitution, things do work out. The equation
(I+2A)-1 = (1/4) (I-2A)​
is, indeed, in error.
 
Mark44 said:
Should be an alternating series, and the coefficient on a2 is wrong.

yeah, it should be 4

1/(1 + 2a) can be written as (1 + 2a)-1.

(I + 2A)-1 has a similar expansion. That's the connection.

a is variable and A is matrix. Can matrix also be expanded?

I also don't get what your solution manual shows for (I + 2A)-1; namely, the 1/4 factor. I think it's a typo.

Hurkyl said:
(I've changed the variable in the above to reduce confusion)

Sorry, I meant plugging in (I-2A) in for the "inverse of I+2A" -- i.e. B=I+2A and B-1=I-2A.

My mistake, though -- when you make the substitution, things do work out. The equation
(I+2A)-1 = (1/4) (I-2A)​
is, indeed, in error.

So, (I + 2A)-1 should be equal to (I-2A). Am I right?

Thanks
 
Yes, since (I + 2A)(I - 2A) = I. This means that I + 2A is the inverse of I - 2A.
 
Thanks a lot Mark and Hurkyl :smile:
 
songoku said:
yeah, it should be 4



a is variable and A is matrix. Can matrix also be expanded?
Yes; you can do calculus with matrices! It's a little trickier, but useful. However, you don't have to know matrix analysis to use it as inspiration -- e.g. armed with the knowledge of geometric series, you can guess at a formula for the inverse of (I - A) is for any nilpotent matrix A... and once you have made the guess, it's easy to show directly that the formula does give the inverse.
 
  • #10
Hurkyl said:
Yes; you can do calculus with matrices! It's a little trickier, but useful. However, you don't have to know matrix analysis to use it as inspiration -- e.g. armed with the knowledge of geometric series, you can guess at a formula for the inverse of (I - A) is for any nilpotent matrix A... and once you have made the guess, it's easy to show directly that the formula does give the inverse.

hm...haven't studied about it yet but I read about it a little on wiki. Thanks a lot hurkyl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K