Can You Construct a Non-Empty Perfect Set in R Containing No Rationals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mosis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A non-empty perfect set in R that contains no rational numbers can be constructed using a method similar to the Cantor set. The set of irrational numbers alone does not satisfy the conditions as it is not a proper subset of R. To create such a set, one can enumerate the rationals within a chosen interval [a, b] and iteratively remove small intervals around each rational number, ensuring the remaining set is closed and contains no isolated points. This construction guarantees the existence of a non-empty perfect subset of R devoid of rational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perfect sets in topology
  • Familiarity with the Cantor set construction
  • Knowledge of dense sets and isolated points
  • Basic concepts of metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of perfect sets in topology
  • Learn about the Cantor set and its construction techniques
  • Explore the concept of dense subsets in metric spaces
  • Investigate the relationship between closed sets and isolated points
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis and topology, as well as educators looking for examples of perfect sets without rational numbers.

Mosis
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is there a perfect set that contains no rationals?

Homework Equations


A set is perfect if it is closed and contains no isolated points.

The Attempt at a Solution


Why not just take the set of irrational numbers as your whole space? This set is certainly closed as it's the whole metric space, and it contains no isolated points, as the irrationals are dense in themselves.

What's wrong with this? I'm not confident it's correct since this was given as a bonus problem on an assignment, but I can't see what's wrong with my example.

Edit: the prof probably meant for us to find a perfect subset of R with no rationals, 'cause that seems a lot harder and I don't even know where to start. so how might I go about doing that, then?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure what is meant is a set perfect in R. The answer is affirmative. The simplest example is \emptyset. If you require the set to be non-empty, then you can emulate the construction of the cantor set (consider irrational numbers a,b and enumerate the rationals in [a,b] and then inductively remove an interval around each of them). If you need further help or ideas see the solution at (I suggest you try to construct it yourself before you look):
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ANonemptyPerfectSubsetOfMathbbRThatContainsNoRationalNumber.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K