Can you explain the theory behind separable differential equations?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samwinnick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Separable Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the theory behind separable differential equations (DEs), particularly the conceptual understanding of the notation and manipulation of derivatives and differentials. Participants explore the implications of treating derivatives as fractions and the validity of various transformations used in solving separable DEs.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the theoretical basis of separable DEs, questioning the validity of treating dy/dx as a fraction that can be separated.
  • Another participant describes a separable equation in the form of dy/dx = f(x)g(y) and discusses a transformation that leads to integrating both sides, while noting the questionable nature of the manipulation.
  • A third participant clarifies that while the derivative is not a fraction, it behaves like one due to its definition as a limit of a fraction, allowing for certain manipulations under specific conditions.
  • One participant acknowledges the need to understand differentials better, indicating a gap in their knowledge regarding the chain rule and substitution rule in integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the treatment of derivatives as fractions. There are differing views on the validity of certain manipulations and the foundational understanding of differentials and derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of differentials and the foundational concepts of calculus, particularly regarding the chain rule and substitution rule, which may affect their grasp of separable DEs.

samwinnick
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm just starting my DE class, although I've been familiar with separable DEs for a while. Although they're (so far) pretty straight-forward to solve, I don't really understand the theory behind seperable DEs. In calc 1, it was stressed that dy/dx is NOT a fraction that can be "taken apart." Looking at the definition of the derivative, it's clear that you cannot rewrite the limit as one limit divided by another limit, because the denominator would be 0, breaking a limit law. It seems to me that the point of derivatives is that we have this indeterminate 0/0 form that, given the context of the original function, we can solve. It seems to me that separating the limit would be like saying that the dy doesn't depend on the dx. This seems like an "abuse of notation" to me, just like the one often used to "proof" the derivative chain rule. Can somebody please help me clear this up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A separable equation is ## \frac {dy} {dx} = f(x)g(y) ##. The trick you are concerned with transforms that as ## \frac {dy} {g(y)} = f(x)dx ## and it is indeed questionable. However, it can be transformed as ## \frac {1} {g(y)} \frac {dy} {dx} = \frac {y'(x)} {g(y(x))} = f(x) ##, and then integrated ## \int \frac {y'(x)} {g(y(x))} dx = \int f(x) dx##. The expression on the left hand side is integrated by substituting ## z = y(x) ##, when it becomes ## \int \frac {dz} {g(z)} ## which is different from the "trick" ## \frac {dy} {g(y)} ## only in notation. That's why the trick works.
 
The derivative is, indeed, not a fraction but it is defined as the limit of a fraction with the result that it has the properties of a fraction: That is if f(y) is a function of y and y= g(x) is a function of x, then we can write f(g(x)) and differentiate with respect to x to get the chain rule: df/dx= (df/dy)(dy/dx). You cannot "prove" that by simply saying "the 'dy's cancel", but you can prove it by going back before the limit, canceling in the "difference quotients" and then taking the limit.

It is in order to use that "fraction property" that differentials are defined in terms of the derivative, usually in a second semester Calculus course. If we have dy/dx= f(x)g(y), where "dy/dx" is the derivative, not a fraction, we can then write dy/g(y)= f(x)dx where "dy" and "dx" are now differentials, not derivatives.
 
Thanks, Voko. That's exactly what I was looking for. Now I just need to refresh myself on the mechanics of the substitution rule...

HallsofIvy, I think you found where the hole in my knowledge is. Both the chain rule and the substitution rule (for integration) are something I've kind of "accepted" up until this point, but differentials are really the source of my problem. I'll go learn about differentials now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K