Can You Find a Counterexample to the Recursive Lucas and Fibonacci Relationship?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostskwid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the recursive definitions of the Lucas and Fibonacci sequences, specifically examining the relationship L0 + L1 + L2 + L3 ... Ln = Ln+2 - 1. Participants seek a counterexample to this formula using an inductive approach. The conversation highlights the importance of proving or disproving mathematical relationships through rigorous methods, such as induction, and suggests that variations of the formula may exist depending on the constants used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recursive sequences, specifically Lucas and Fibonacci sequences.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques.
  • Basic knowledge of summation notation and its applications.
  • Experience with proving mathematical statements and counterexamples.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Lucas and Fibonacci sequences in depth.
  • Study mathematical induction and its applications in proving formulas.
  • Explore variations of recursive relationships and their implications.
  • Investigate common counterexamples in recursive sequence definitions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of recursive sequences and mathematical proofs.

ghostskwid
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi I am playing around with recursive definitions of Lucas and Fibonacci sequences:

I came across a relationship

L0 + L1 + L2 + L3 ... Ln = sum(i = 0, n) Li = Ln+2 -1;

Sorry for the horrible notation, but could anyone provide a counter example using an inductive approach? I get the counter example through guessing, but am having a hard time proving it definitively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any counterexample would show that your formula is wrong, it does not matter how you got that counterexample.

You can show this formula via induction, this is an easy example of induction.
Actually, there should be a similar relation independent of the starting values, where just the constant in the formula has to be changed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K