Lucas Numbers/ Fibonacci Numbers Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter cwatki14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship between Lucas numbers and Fibonacci numbers, specifically showing that the Lucas numbers satisfy a recurrence relation similar to that of Fibonacci numbers. The original poster presents a question about the induction step of their proof and seeks clarification on a flawed argument regarding mathematical induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the induction step and suggest expressing Lucas numbers in terms of Fibonacci numbers to facilitate the proof. There is also a focus on identifying the flaws in the provided argument, particularly regarding the necessity of a base case in mathematical induction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the induction process and questioning the validity of the argument presented by the original poster. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need for a base case in the induction proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing the requirements of mathematical induction, specifically the importance of establishing a base case before proceeding with the induction hypothesis.

cwatki14
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Here's the question:
The Lucas numbers Ln are defined by the equations L1=1 and Ln=Fn+1 + Fn-1 for each n>/= 2. Fn stands for a fibonacci number, Fn= Fn=1 + Fn-2. Prove that
Ln=Ln-1+Ln-2 (for n>/= 3)
So I did the base case where n=3, but I am stuck on the induction step... Any ideas?
Then the problem asks "what is wrong with the following argument?"
"Assuming Ln=Fn for n=1,2,...,k we see that
Lk+1=Lk=Lk-1 (by the above proof)
=Fk+Fk-1 (by our assumption)
=Fk+1 (by definition of Fk+1)
Hence by the principle of mathematical induction Fn=Ln for each positive n."

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the induction step, express L(n-1) and L(n-2) in terms of Fibonacci numbers (using the induction hyphotesis) and recombine the terms.

Then the problem asks "what is wrong with the following argument?"
The base case.
 
Is it that the proof completely lacks a base case and just assumes it is true up to k+1?
 
Yes. You need to show a base case works in order to apply the induction hypotheis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K