Can you make the induction step by contradiction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that a proof by induction can be completed using a contradiction approach. By assuming P(n) is true and P(n+1) is false, one can derive a contradiction that validates the implication P(n) → P(n+1). This method effectively demonstrates that if P(n) holds, then P(n+1) must also hold, thereby fulfilling the requirements of mathematical induction. The logical steps involve the use of de Morgan's laws to transform the contradiction into the necessary implication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction principles
  • Familiarity with logical operators and de Morgan's laws
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Basic proficiency in formal logic notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore proof by contradiction techniques in various mathematical contexts
  • Review de Morgan's laws and their applications in logic
  • Practice constructing formal proofs using induction and contradiction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, students studying discrete mathematics, and anyone interested in formal logic and proof techniques.

jack476
Messages
327
Reaction score
124
Assuming you've sufficiently proven your inductive basis, can you complete a proof by induction in the following manner:

Make the inductive hypothesis, assume P(n) is true for some n. Assume P(n+1) is not true. If it follows from the assumption that P(n+1) is false that P(n) must also therefore be false, contradicting the inductive hypothesis, does this mean P(n) must imply P(n+1)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is valid.
The assumption from which you derived the contradiction was ##\exists n\ P(n)\wedge\neg P(n+1)##. Deriving a contradiction from this proves its negation, which is ##\forall n\neg(P(n)\wedge \neg P(n+1))##
which, by de Morgan, is equivalent to
##\forall n\ \neg P(n)\vee P(n+1)##
which is equivalent to
##\forall n\ P(n)\to P(n+1)##
which is what we need to complete the induction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159
Lovely, thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K