MHB Can You Prove Inequality Challenge II?

AI Thread Summary
The cubic polynomial \( p(x) = x^3 + mx^2 + nx + k \) has three distinct real roots, while the transformed polynomial \( (x^2 + x + 2014)^3 + m(x^2 + x + 2014)^2 + n(x^2 + x + 2014) + k = 0 \) has no real roots. This leads to the conclusion that the discriminant of \( x^2 + x + 2014 - \alpha \) must be negative for each root \( \alpha, \beta, \gamma \), resulting in \( 2014 - \alpha > \frac{1}{4} \). Consequently, it follows that \( k + 2014n + 2014^2m + 2014^3 > \frac{1}{64} \). The proof hinges on the relationships between the roots and the conditions imposed by the lack of real roots in the transformed polynomial.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
The cubic polynomial $x^3+mx^2+nx+k=0$ has three distinct real roots but the other polynomial $(x^2+x+2014)^3+m(x^2+x+2014)^2+n(x^2+x+2014)+k=0$ has no real roots. Show that $k+2014n+2014^2m+2014^3>\dfrac{1}{64}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]Let $p(x) = x^3+mx^2+nx+k$, and let $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ be its three real roots, so that $p(x) = (x-\alpha)(x - \beta)(x - \gamma).$ Let $Y = 2014.$ If $p(x^2 + x + Y) = 0$ then $x^2+x+Y$ must be a root of $p(x)$, say $x^2+x+Y = \alpha.$ But if $p(x^2 + x + Y) = 0$ has no real roots then $x^2+x+ Y - \alpha = 0$ must have no real roots, so its discriminant must be negative: $1 - 4(Y- \alpha) < 0.$ Therefore $Y-\alpha > \frac14$, and similarly $Y-\beta > \frac14$, $Y-\gamma > \frac14$. It follows that $$ k+2014n+2014^2m+2014^3 = p(Y) = (Y -\alpha)(Y - \beta)(Y - \gamma) > \tfrac14\cdot \tfrac14\cdot \tfrac14 = \tfrac1{64}.$$[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Let $p(x) = x^3+mx^2+nx+k$, and let $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ be its three real roots, so that $p(x) = (x-\alpha)(x - \beta)(x - \gamma).$ Let $Y = 2014.$ If $p(x^2 + x + Y) = 0$ then $x^2+x+Y$ must be a root of $p(x)$, say $x^2+x+Y = \alpha.$ But if $p(x^2 + x + Y) = 0$ has no real roots then $x^2+x+ Y - \alpha = 0$ must have no real roots, so its discriminant must be negative: $1 - 4(Y- \alpha) < 0.$ Therefore $Y-\alpha > \frac14$, and similarly $Y-\beta > \frac14$, $Y-\gamma > \frac14$. It follows that $$ k+2014n+2014^2m+2014^3 = p(Y) = (Y -\alpha)(Y - \beta)(Y - \gamma) > \tfrac14\cdot \tfrac14\cdot \tfrac14 = \tfrac1{64}.$$[/sp]

Bravo, Opalg!...and thanks for participating!:)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top