MHB Can You Prove These Properties of Normal Subgroups in Group Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving properties of normal subgroups in group theory, specifically regarding two normal subgroups, $H$ and $K$, of a group $G$ where $H \le K$. It is established that $H$ is a normal subgroup of $K$ and that the quotient group $K/H$ is a normal subgroup of the quotient group $G/H$. The proofs rely on the definitions of normal subgroups and quotient groups, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating that conjugation by elements of $K$ and $G$ preserves the subgroup structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly normal subgroups.
  • Familiarity with the definition and properties of quotient groups.
  • Knowledge of group operations and conjugation.
  • Ability to manipulate and prove statements involving group elements and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of normal subgroups in detail.
  • Learn about quotient groups and their significance in group theory.
  • Explore examples of normal subgroups in specific groups, such as symmetric and alternating groups.
  • Investigate the implications of the First Isomorphism Theorem in relation to normal subgroups.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone studying group theory who seeks to deepen their understanding of normal subgroups and their properties.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I am struck on a problem dealing with normal subgroups.

The problem is the following:

Let $G$ be a group, $H$ and $K$ be normal subgroups of $G$ with $H\ge K$.
  1. Prove that $H$ is a normal subgroup of $K$
  2. Prove that $K/H$ is a normal subgroup of $G/H$.
My attempted work:

Proof: We know that $H,K\ge G$.

Thanks
Carter B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
The problem is the following:

Let $G$ be a group, $H$ and $K$ be normal subgroups of $G$ with $H\ge K$.
  1. Prove that $H$ is a normal subgroup of $K$
  2. Prove that $K/H$ is a normal subgroup of $G/H$.
It looks as though $H\ge K$ should be $H\le K$. The rest of the question certainly implies that $H$ is contained in $K$.

Start by writing down the definition of a normal subgroup. Use that definition to say what it means for $H$ to be a normal subgroup of $G$. You should be able to deduce the result 1. from that.

For 2., again start by writing down some definitions. How is a quotient group defined? Then what conditions does $K/H$ have to satisfy in order to be a normal subgroup of $G/H$?
 
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

I am struck on a problem dealing with normal subgroups.

The problem is the following:

Let $G$ be a group, $H$ and $K$ be normal subgroups of $G$ with $H{\color{red}\le} K$.
  1. Prove that $H$ is a normal subgroup of $K$
  2. Prove that $K/H$ is a normal subgroup of $G/H$.
My attempted work:

Proof: We know that $H,K{\color{red}\le} G$.

Thanks
Carter B

Hi Carter.

Note the corrections in red.

1. To show that $H$ is a normal subgroup of $K$, you need to snow that $kHk^{-1}=H$ for all $k\in K$. But $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$, i.e. $gHg^{-1}=H$ for all $g\in G$. Can you complete the proof?2. $K/H$ is the set of all cosets of $H$ in $K$, i.e. cosets of the form $kH$ for $k\in K$. An element of $G/H$ is a coset of the form $gH$ where $g\in G$. To show that $K/H$ is a normal subgroup of $G/H$, you need to show that
$$\left(gH\right)\left(kH\right)\left(gH\right)^{-1}$$
is in $K/H$. The above is equal to
$$\left(gkg^{-1}\right)H.$$
As $K$ is normal in $G$, what can you say about $gkg^{-1}$?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
573
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
922
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K