Can You Prove This Fourier Transform Property?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving a property of the Fourier Transform related to the scaling of functions. Specifically, if \( g(x) = f(\lambda x + y) \) for a non-zero real number \( \lambda \), then the Fourier Transform \( G(k) \) is expressed as \( G(k) = \frac{1}{\lambda} e^{ik/\lambda}F(\frac{k}{\lambda}) \). The participants confirm that by substituting variables and applying the definition of the Fourier Transform, the relationship can be established, correcting a typo in the original formula regarding the exponent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform definitions and properties
  • Knowledge of integrable functions and their transformations
  • Familiarity with variable substitution techniques in calculus
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier Transforms in detail, focusing on scaling and shifting
  • Learn about variable substitution in integrals, particularly in the context of Fourier analysis
  • Explore applications of Fourier Transforms in signal processing and data analysis
  • Investigate common errors and misconceptions in Fourier Transform calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and students studying signal processing or Fourier analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of Fourier Transform properties and their applications.

dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
Here's my problem:
Suppose that f is an integrable function. If \lambda \ne 0 is a real number and g(x) = f(\lambda x + y) proove that

<br /> G(k) = \frac{1}{\lambda} e^{ik/\lambda}F(\frac{k}{\lambda})<br />

Where F and G are the Fourier transforms of f and g, respectively.

I've got the Fourier transform of f(x) as

<br /> F(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

Likewise for g(x) I have

<br /> G(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty g(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

for F(K/lambda) I have

<br /> F(K/\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(\lambda x + y) e^{-ik(\lambda x + y)/\lambda} d(\lambda x + y)<br />

My guess is that the answer is relatively simple from here, but I'm not sure how to go about it. Does anyone understand this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
Here's my problem:


I've got the Fourier transform of f(x) as

<br /> F(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

Likewise for g(x) I have

<br /> G(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty g(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

for F(K/lambda) I have

<br /> F(K/\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(\lambda x + y) e^{-ik(\lambda x + y)/\lambda} d(\lambda x + y)<br />
You should simply apply the definition to g(x), so

G(k) = {1 \over {\sqrt{ 2 \pi}} } \int dx \,f(\lambda x + y) \, e^{-i kx}

Now, define a new variable x'= lambda x + y so that x=(x'-y)/lambda and dx= dx'/lambda.

You get

G(k) = { 1\over \lambda} {1 \over {\sqrt{ 2 \pi}}} \int \, dx&#039; \, f(x&#039;) \, e^{-i k x&#039;/ \lambda} e^{i k y / \lambda}

which directly gives the result you were looking for (I am asusming there was typo in the fomula you gave and that the y was missing in the exponent).

Patrick
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K