Can You Prove This Inequality Involving Real Numbers?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality $\dfrac {c}{a+b} +\dfrac {a}{b+c} +\dfrac {b}{c+a}\geq \dfrac {3}{2}$ for positive real numbers $a, b, c$ is proven using symmetry and logical reasoning. The minimum value occurs when $a = b = c$, yielding a value of $\dfrac{3}{2}$. This approach avoids calculus by leveraging the equality of the variables. The discussion references Nesbitt's inequality, which is a well-known result in inequality theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and inequalities
  • Familiarity with Nesbitt's inequality
  • Basic knowledge of symmetry in mathematical expressions
  • Concept of optimization without calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proofs of Nesbitt's inequality
  • Explore other inequalities in real analysis
  • Learn about symmetric functions and their properties
  • Investigate optimization techniques in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in inequality proofs and optimization techniques.

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$ a,b,c \in\mathbb{R}^+ , \,\,\text{Prove:}$

$\dfrac {c}{a+b} +\dfrac {a}{b+c} +\dfrac {b}{c+a}\geq \dfrac {3}{2}$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$ a,b,c \in\mathbb{R}^+ , \,\,\text{Prove:}$

$\dfrac {c}{a+b} +\dfrac {a}{b+c} +\dfrac {b}{c+a}\geq \dfrac {3}{2}$

Setting $\displaystyle f(a,b,c) = \frac{c}{a+b} + \frac{a}{b+c} + \frac{b}{c+a}$ find the points of minimum imposing $\displaystyle \frac{\partial f}{\partial a} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial b} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial c} = 0$ and then compute f(*,*,*) in these points... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
If without the use of calculus,how can we proceed ?
 
Albert said:
If without the use of calculus,how can we proceed ?

As 'pure logical' approach to the problem You can consider that the role of the variable a, b and c is exactly the same, i.e. You can swap them and nothing changes. That means that the minimum of f(*,*,*) is when a=b=c and in that case is f(*,*,*)= 3/2...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
your analysis is reasonable (Yes)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K