MHB Can you simplify this surd expression without a calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Simplifying
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Without the use of a calculator, and showing your work, simplify:

$$\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(239+169\sqrt{2}\right)^{ \frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41\right)^{ \frac{1}{5}}\right)$$

edit: My apologies...I was careless in my first statement of the problem...(Nod)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, MarkFL!

Without the use of a calculator, and showing your work, simplify:

. . \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\left(239+169\sqrt{2}\right)^{ \frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41\right)^{\frac{1}{5}}\right)
We find that: .239 + 169\sqrt{2} \:=\: (1+\sqrt{2})^7

. . .and that: .. 29\sqrt{2} - 41 \:=\: (\sqrt{2} - 1)^5

So we have: .\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\left[(1+\sqrt{2})^7\right]^{\frac{1}{7}} - \left[(\sqrt{2}-1)^5\right]^{\frac{1}{5}}\right)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}\bigg(\left[1 + \sqrt{2}\right] - \left[\sqrt{2}-1\right]\bigg)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}\big(1 + \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{2} + 1\big)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}(2)

. . . . . . . =\;1
 
@Soroban. You are the master of coming up with solutions that seem to come out of the blue. How the heck did you get the first two lines of your solution?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
@Soroban. You are the master of coming up with solutions that seem to come out of the blue. How the heck did you get the first two lines of your solution?

-Dan

My thoughts exactly. I was sitting there, thinking, "okay". You must teach me! (Rofl)
 
(239+169√2)^1/7

the root can be of the form (a+b √2) and expanding and equating the rational parts of both sides and irrational parts of both sides we get 2 equations in a and b
then solving them we get a = b = 1

I know these are polynomials of degree 7 and 6 and solving is not simple so assuming a and b as integers
we can put the values on both sides and get a and b.

simlilarly for we can find 5th root of 2nd expression
 
This is the observation I made before constructing this problem:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^0=0\cdot\sqrt{2}+1$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^1=1\cdot\sqrt{2}+1$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^2=2\cdot\sqrt{2}+3$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^3=5\cdot\sqrt{2}+7$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^4=12\cdot\sqrt{2}+17$$

Now, we may generalize to say:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^n=U_n\sqrt{2}+V_n$$

We may further generalize and write:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}-1 \right)^n=(-1)^{n-1}\left(U_n\sqrt{2}-V_n \right)$$

The parameters may be defined recursively as:

$$U_{n+1}=2U_{n}+U_{n-1}$$ where $$U_0=0,\,U_1=1$$

$$V_{n+1}=2V_{n}+V_{n-1}$$ where $$V_0=1,\,V_1=1$$

We then find:

$$U_5=29,\,U_7=169$$

$$V_5=41,\,V_7=239$$

and so:

$$29\sqrt{2}-41=(-1)^4\left(\sqrt{2}-1 \right)^5\,\therefore\,\left(29\sqrt{2}-41 \right)^{\frac{1}{5}}=\sqrt{2}-1$$

$$169\sqrt{2}+239=\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^7\,\therefore\,\left(169\sqrt{2}+239 \right)^{\frac{1}{7}}=\sqrt{2}+1$$

Hence:

$$\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(169\sqrt{2}+239 \right)^{\frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41 \right)^{\frac{1}{5}} \right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}+1-\sqrt{2}+1 \right)=\frac{1}{2}\cdot2=1$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top