Can you simplify this surd expression without a calculator?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Simplifying
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of a surd expression without the use of a calculator. Participants explore various methods and reasoning related to the expression involving roots and coefficients of irrational numbers, focusing on both theoretical and practical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the surd expression and requests simplification, noting a previous error in the problem statement.
  • Another participant echoes the request for simplification, reiterating the expression.
  • A participant expresses admiration for another's solution approach, seeking clarification on how the initial steps were derived.
  • A participant proposes a method to express the first term as a sum of rational and irrational parts, leading to a system of equations to solve for coefficients.
  • One participant shares a recursive relationship for sequences derived from powers of \((\sqrt{2}+1)\) and \((\sqrt{2}-1)\), suggesting a generalization that connects to the terms in the original expression.
  • This participant concludes that the simplification leads to a final result of 1, based on their derived relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the simplification process, as participants present different methods and reasoning. Some express admiration for others' approaches, but the discussion remains open-ended without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various assumptions about the forms of the expressions and the nature of the roots involved. The discussion includes recursive definitions and relationships that may not be universally accepted or verified within the context of the problem.

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Without the use of a calculator, and showing your work, simplify:

$$\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(239+169\sqrt{2}\right)^{ \frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41\right)^{ \frac{1}{5}}\right)$$

edit: My apologies...I was careless in my first statement of the problem...(Nod)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, MarkFL!

Without the use of a calculator, and showing your work, simplify:

. . \tfrac{1}{2}\left(\left(239+169\sqrt{2}\right)^{ \frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41\right)^{\frac{1}{5}}\right)
We find that: .239 + 169\sqrt{2} \:=\: (1+\sqrt{2})^7

. . .and that: .. 29\sqrt{2} - 41 \:=\: (\sqrt{2} - 1)^5

So we have: .\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\left[(1+\sqrt{2})^7\right]^{\frac{1}{7}} - \left[(\sqrt{2}-1)^5\right]^{\frac{1}{5}}\right)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}\bigg(\left[1 + \sqrt{2}\right] - \left[\sqrt{2}-1\right]\bigg)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}\big(1 + \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{2} + 1\big)

. . . . . . . =\;\tfrac{1}{2}(2)

. . . . . . . =\;1
 
@Soroban. You are the master of coming up with solutions that seem to come out of the blue. How the heck did you get the first two lines of your solution?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
@Soroban. You are the master of coming up with solutions that seem to come out of the blue. How the heck did you get the first two lines of your solution?

-Dan

My thoughts exactly. I was sitting there, thinking, "okay". You must teach me! (Rofl)
 
(239+169√2)^1/7

the root can be of the form (a+b √2) and expanding and equating the rational parts of both sides and irrational parts of both sides we get 2 equations in a and b
then solving them we get a = b = 1

I know these are polynomials of degree 7 and 6 and solving is not simple so assuming a and b as integers
we can put the values on both sides and get a and b.

simlilarly for we can find 5th root of 2nd expression
 
This is the observation I made before constructing this problem:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^0=0\cdot\sqrt{2}+1$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^1=1\cdot\sqrt{2}+1$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^2=2\cdot\sqrt{2}+3$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^3=5\cdot\sqrt{2}+7$$

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^4=12\cdot\sqrt{2}+17$$

Now, we may generalize to say:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^n=U_n\sqrt{2}+V_n$$

We may further generalize and write:

$$\left(\sqrt{2}-1 \right)^n=(-1)^{n-1}\left(U_n\sqrt{2}-V_n \right)$$

The parameters may be defined recursively as:

$$U_{n+1}=2U_{n}+U_{n-1}$$ where $$U_0=0,\,U_1=1$$

$$V_{n+1}=2V_{n}+V_{n-1}$$ where $$V_0=1,\,V_1=1$$

We then find:

$$U_5=29,\,U_7=169$$

$$V_5=41,\,V_7=239$$

and so:

$$29\sqrt{2}-41=(-1)^4\left(\sqrt{2}-1 \right)^5\,\therefore\,\left(29\sqrt{2}-41 \right)^{\frac{1}{5}}=\sqrt{2}-1$$

$$169\sqrt{2}+239=\left(\sqrt{2}+1 \right)^7\,\therefore\,\left(169\sqrt{2}+239 \right)^{\frac{1}{7}}=\sqrt{2}+1$$

Hence:

$$\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(169\sqrt{2}+239 \right)^{\frac{1}{7}}-\left(29\sqrt{2}-41 \right)^{\frac{1}{5}} \right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{2}+1-\sqrt{2}+1 \right)=\frac{1}{2}\cdot2=1$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K