Can You Solve x*log(x) = 0.1*x^2 Using Logarithmic Properties?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mycrafish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Logarithm
Click For Summary
The equation x*log(x) = 0.1*x^2 can be approached using logarithmic properties and the Lambert W function. First, it is important to note that x=0 is not a valid solution due to the undefined log(0). By dividing both sides by x, the equation simplifies to log(x) = 0.1x, which can be rewritten as x = e^(0.1x). This leads to the transformation involving the Lambert W function, yielding the solution x = -10W(-0.1), approximately equal to 1.11833. The Lambert W function serves as the key tool for solving this equation effectively.
mycrafish
x*log(x)=0.1*x^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My guess is that using Newton's Method would be the easiest. I don't see any easy way to isolate x in that equation.
 
mycrafish said:
x*log(x)=0.1*x^2
Is log = log10? Then I'd guess about, oh, let's see, ... 10? :smile:
 
First, of course, x= 0 is not a solution because log(0) is not defined. So you can divide both sides by x to get log(x)= 0.1 x. You can now write this as x= e^{0.1x}. If you let y= -0.1x, that becomes -y/0.1= e^{-y}. Now multiply on both sides by -0.1e^y to get ye^y= -0.1.

Now we can take the Lambert W function of both sides:
y= -0.1x= W(-0.1) so x= -10W(-0.1)= -10(-0.111833)= 1.11833 (to six significant figures).

(The Lambert W function is defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xe^x. It is also known as the "ProductLog" function. Mathematica evaluates that function and it can be evaluated at http://functions.wolfram.com/webMathematica/FunctionEvaluation.jsp?name=ProductLog. That's what I used to get the value above.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K