Can you take the Laplacian of a vector field with cylindrical coordinates?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hunt_mat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplacian Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Laplacian operator to a vector field in cylindrical coordinates. Specifically, the vector field is represented as \(\mathbf{A}=(0,A(x,y,z),0)\), and the correct formulation for the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates is provided. The key takeaway is that the Laplacian of a vector field \(\vec{A}=A(r,\theta,z)\vec{i}_{\theta}\) must account for the angular dependency of the unit vector, leading to a specific expression for \(\nabla^{2}\vec{A}\). This highlights that a direct application of the Laplacian to the scalar component \(A\) is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and differential operators
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of the Laplacian operator and its properties
  • Experience with differentiating vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about vector calculus identities in non-Cartesian systems
  • Explore applications of the Laplacian operator in physics and engineering
  • Investigate the relationship between scalar and vector fields in different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with vector fields in cylindrical coordinates, as well as students studying advanced calculus and differential equations.

hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,816
Reaction score
33
Tell me I'm not going mad. If I have a vector field of the form \mathbf{A}=(0,A(x,y,z),0) and I want to take the Laplacian of it, \nabla^{2}\mathbf{A}, can I take the Laplacian of the co-ordinate function A(x,y,z)? Will this be the same for the case of cylindrical co-ordinates?

Mat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's true for Cartesian coordinates.
For cylindrical coordinates, you must remember that a planar unit vector is dependent upon the angular variable, so take care to differentiate that unit vector as well.

For a vector field \vec{A}=A(r,\theta,z)\vec{i}_{\theta} we'll get, for example,
\nabla^{2}\vec{A}=(A_{rr}+\frac{A_{r}}{r}-\frac{A}{r^{2}}+\frac{A_{\theta\theta}}{r^{2}}+A_{zz})\vec{i}_{\theta}-\frac{2A_{\theta}}{r^{2}}\vec{i}_{r}
where lower case on the scalar function indicates differentiation with respect to that variable.
Note that this does NOT equal a naive application of the Laplacian operator merely to the scalar component A.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K