Can you use magnets to push other magnets unlimited amount of times?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rafal94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Push
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using magnets to create a perpetual motion device, specifically a design involving a magnetic ball within a vacuum tube. Participants clarify that such a device is impossible due to the fundamental properties of magnetic fields, including the impossibility of creating a magnetic monopole and the divergence of magnetic fields being zero. The conversation highlights that while the design can be modified, it ultimately cannot achieve continuous motion due to inherent physical laws, including Gauss's law and the nature of magnetic field lines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field properties
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law and Stokes' Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of perpetual motion concepts
  • Introduction to vector calculus (for advanced understanding)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetic fields and their behavior
  • Study Gauss's law and its implications in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of perpetual motion and its historical context
  • Learn about magnetic monopoles and their theoretical implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers interested in electromagnetism, and hobbyists exploring magnetic devices will benefit from this discussion.

rafal94
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I was bored at the lesson, I did some thinking of my own and magnets always fascinated me, still kinda like black magic.

Anyway, i was thinking abou creating this:

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7476/prepetummobile.jpg
I created this in paint as fast as possible so it's not super clear, but the light blue lines in the vacuum tube hae to represent the direction in which the magnets point their energy or whatever they deliver, the magnetic ball is, at the surface, of the same type as the other magnets, so instead pulling together they should be pushing each other, from each other, right? Place the tube horizontal on a surface, create vacuum in the tube to reduce friction, put the ball in it and give it a little move... prepetum mobile?

My teachers said it Could be possible but you have to research much more than I did yet..

In short: can the ball move without stopping if the magnets are pointing in the right direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
rafal94 said:
My teachers said it Could be possible but you have to research much more than I did yet..
It is very unfortunate that your teacher would indicate that such a device could be possible. What you have here is a variation on a fairly common perpetual motion design. You can read Wikipedia article on perpetual motion to get some idea of why these sort of devices don't work in general.

Specifically why this particular design doesn't work requires a bit of a better understanding of magnets. For starters, a "magnetic ball", like the one you show, is impossible. It has to do with the fact that magnetic field lines cannot terminate. If you start at a field line passing through one of the poles, it will go out, wrap around to come back to the other pole, and then return to the point it started from through interior of a magnet. So an outer surface of a magnet cannot be all one pole.

This isn't crucial to this design, however, and it can be modified to fix that particular issue. However, same kind of rules are followed by all of the outer magnets, and if you actually connect all the field lines properly, you would see that the pattern does not provide you with a constant pushing force in one direction. Instead, you'll find places where the "ball" tends to get stuck.

There are some specific theorems that deal with why you can't create a cycle where magnet is being pushed always in the same direction, but they involve vector calculus, so they are probably a bit above your level.
 
Hi.
Actually the biggest problem is making the ball.
If I understand your drawing, it should have only one magnetic pole since its other pole is inside.
However this design is impossible in the real world because of the magnetic fields properties.
 
akka69 said:
Hi.
Actually the biggest problem is making the ball.
If I understand your drawing, it should have only one magnetic pole since its other pole is inside.
However this design is impossible in the real world because of the magnetic fields properties.

Not quite you could stick lots of small magnets into the surface ball like object.Like cocktail sticks in an orange.The north end of the magnet just sticking out.
 
Buckleymanor said:
Not quite you could stick lots of small magnets into the surface ball like object.Like cocktail sticks in an orange.The north end of the magnet just sticking out.
No, you cannot, because divergence of magnetic field is zero.If you do place magnets like that, you'll either end up with field escaping through gaps, meaning you'll have surface consisting of north and south poles, or if you manage to close gaps perfectly, you'll kill the magnetic field.
 
or if you manage to close gaps perfectly, you'll kill the magnetic field.
If wern't so perfect could you get the desired effect.
 
No, because the gaps would act as the opposite pole. You can sort of think of magnet's poles as magnetic charges. Well, the amount of positive and negative magnetic charge on magnet's surface must be equal. So you can either have both North and South poles, or you can have neither.
 
I guess this is not the only design flaw
Even if making the sphere was possible, you would have as many magnets pushing before and behind the ball, which would anihilate the thrust.
 
As far as I remember such a ball would have a magnetic field of zero. There is some integral law that guarantees this if I remember correctly.
 
  • #10
There's no perpetual motion. There's no magnetic monopole, which is what you are trying to create with your sphere. But the negative and positive poles of the sphere cancel out and give no overall magnetic charge. The integral law is known as Gauss's law which is a special case of Stokes' Theorem.
 
  • #11
Sorry - we don;t discuss perpetual motion machines here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K