Can you use speed and velocity interchangeably?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Velocity
Click For Summary
Speed and velocity are closely related concepts, particularly in one-dimensional motion, where they can often be used interchangeably. Speed refers only to magnitude, while velocity includes direction, which is crucial for understanding motion. In a straight line, if speed is x, velocity can be either x or -x, but this relationship does not apply to other types of motion, such as circular motion. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting graphs, particularly velocity-time graphs, to determine the nature of the motion. Accurate labeling of such graphs is essential for confirming that the motion is indeed linear.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
qn (di)-> the graph is a v-t graph, so shouldn't we say "constant velocity" instead of "speed"?
Relevant Equations
nil
16255635504933063555622718551114.jpg

16255635202437013700399969144045.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. It's better to describe it as constant velocity, as speed just describes the magnitude and not the sign. (I presume this is one-dimensional motion.)
 
In motion in a straight line such as in your example, the concepts of velocity and speed are almost identical: If speed is x, then velocity will be x or -x. I repeat, this holds only in motion in a straight line, it does not hold for other motions e.g. circular motion.
 
Delta2 said:
in a straight line
how can you tell it's in a straight line ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ellieee said:
how can u tell it's in a straight line ?
I can not infer it from the given data (the screenshot of the graph isn't complete, doesn't completely show the text that describes the graph), somehow I thought it was given to you.
 
ellieee said:
how can u tell it's in a straight line ?
Since they label it a velocity-time graph, where the velocity is constant it must be moving in a straight line. (Assuming it's labeled accurately.)
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
377
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K