Can you use speed and velocity interchangeably?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ellieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Speed and velocity are closely related concepts, particularly in one-dimensional motion, where they can often be used interchangeably. Speed refers only to magnitude, while velocity includes direction, which is crucial for understanding motion. In a straight line, if speed is x, velocity can be either x or -x, but this relationship does not apply to other types of motion, such as circular motion. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting graphs, particularly velocity-time graphs, to determine the nature of the motion. Accurate labeling of such graphs is essential for confirming that the motion is indeed linear.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
qn (di)-> the graph is a v-t graph, so shouldn't we say "constant velocity" instead of "speed"?
Relevant Equations
nil
16255635504933063555622718551114.jpg

16255635202437013700399969144045.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. It's better to describe it as constant velocity, as speed just describes the magnitude and not the sign. (I presume this is one-dimensional motion.)
 
In motion in a straight line such as in your example, the concepts of velocity and speed are almost identical: If speed is x, then velocity will be x or -x. I repeat, this holds only in motion in a straight line, it does not hold for other motions e.g. circular motion.
 
Delta2 said:
in a straight line
how can you tell it's in a straight line ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ellieee said:
how can u tell it's in a straight line ?
I can not infer it from the given data (the screenshot of the graph isn't complete, doesn't completely show the text that describes the graph), somehow I thought it was given to you.
 
ellieee said:
how can u tell it's in a straight line ?
Since they label it a velocity-time graph, where the velocity is constant it must be moving in a straight line. (Assuming it's labeled accurately.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top