I Can you use these equations to calculate explosion overpressure?

AI Thread Summary
Dr. Jorge S. Diaz's video explains modeling blast wave movement, prompting a discussion on whether the same equations can calculate blast wave overpressure based on explosive energy and distance. The original poster expresses difficulty in understanding the video and requests a transcription of the relevant equations for easier access. A suggestion is made to consult existing literature, specifically a 1967 report from Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab, which contains useful equations and figures for understanding air blast effects. The conversation reflects a preference for a theoretical solution over empirical equations, highlighting the challenges faced by those with limited mathematical background. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of established research in calculating explosion overpressure.
Ax_xiom
Messages
58
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
An idiot that shouldn't be doing graduate level maths attempts to do it to calculate a blast wave
So in this video Dr Jorge S. Diaz walks through a way to model the movement of a blast wave (with an explanation that I don't fully follow because I'm an idiot) and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the same equations to calculate the overpressure of a blast wave from a given explosive energy and distance (and vice versa)

Just as an heads up I've only done a bit of differential equations, I can interpete and solve basic ODEs and barely interprete PDEs but can't really solve them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you transcribe the problem and equations here, so every PF user doesn't have to go scan an hour long Youtube video to get up-to-speed?
 
Sorry
1738098595086.png

So he uses these equations to get a formula that describes the movement of a blast wave in respects to time. I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same with overpressure in respects to distance
 
Ax_xiom said:
I'm wondering if it's possible to use the same equations to calculate the overpressure of a blast wave from a given explosive energy and distance (and vice versa)
Rather than trying to reinvent the wheel by performing calculations, you can easily answer this question by consulting the literature. For example, take a look at eq.(2) and fig. 2 in this 1967 report from Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab: Scaling the effects of air blast...
 
Last edited:
renormalize said:
Rather than trying to reinvent the wheel by performing calculations, you can easily answer this question by consulting the literature. For example, take a look at eq.(2) and fig. 2 in this 1967 report from Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab: Scaling the effects of air blast...
This seems like interesting, I would have prefered to have a proper solution that wasn't an empirical equation but beggars can't be choosers (I don't know how to do the maths to do it myself)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top