Can You Verify the Integral of Secant Squared Over (1+Tangent)^3?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Rational
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of secant squared over (1 + tangent) cubed is accurately computed as $$\int\frac{\sec^2(t)}{(1+\tan(t))^3}dt = -\frac{1}{2(1+\tan(t))^2} + C$$. The substitution used is $$u = 1 + \tan(t)$$, leading to $$du = \sec^2(t) dt$$. A common error identified in the discussion is the omission of a negative sign in the final answer, which can be verified by differentiating the result to return to the original integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in integration
  • Ability to differentiate functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts
  • Explore the application of trigonometric substitutions in integrals
  • Learn about the verification of integrals through differentiation
  • Investigate common pitfalls in integral calculus to avoid errors
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus, as well as anyone seeking to improve their skills in solving and verifying integrals.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$$\int\frac{\sec^2 \left({t}\right)}{\left(1+\tan\left({t}\right)\right)^3}dt$$

$$u=1+\tan\left({t}\right)\ du=\sec^2\left({t}\right) dt$$

So far ok?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$$\int\frac{\sec^2 \left({t}\right)}{\left(1+\tan\left({t}\right)\right)^3}dt$$

$$u=1+\tan\left({t}\right)\ du=\sec^2\left({t}\right) dt$$

So far ok?

Yep. (Nod)
 
$$\int\frac{1}{{u}^{3}}du =-\frac{1}{{2u}^{2}}=\frac{1}{2 (1+\tan\left({t}\right)) ^2 }+C$$

I hope the TI gave a different answer?
 
karush said:
$$\int\frac{1}{{u}^{3}}du =-\frac{1}{{2u}^{2}}=\frac{1}{2 (1+\tan\left({t}\right)) ^2 }+C$$

I hope the TI gave a different answer?

You've lost a minus sign in the final answer, but otherwise we can verify that if we take the derivative we get indeed the original integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K