Cancellation of vacuum energy in Wess-Zumino model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the cancellation of vacuum energy in the Wess-Zumino model, specifically to order g². The user, Patrick, reports achieving partial cancellation but encounters a persistent leftover term that cannot be resolved through adjustments to coefficients or signs in the calculations. He confirms that he has completed the one-loop correction for scalar particles, indicating a thorough understanding of the model's intricacies. The inquiry seeks references or insights from others who may have tackled this specific calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Wess-Zumino model
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of vacuum energy and its implications
  • Experience with one-loop corrections in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifics of vacuum energy cancellation in quantum field theories
  • Study the derivation of the Wess-Zumino model and its applications
  • Explore advanced techniques in perturbative calculations
  • Investigate existing literature on vacuum energy in scalar field theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as researchers exploring the Wess-Zumino model and vacuum energy phenomena.

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
Hey,

Has anyone worked out explicitly the cancellation of the vacuum energy in the Wess-Zumino model, to order g^2 (order g is trivially zero). I get a partial cancellation but there is a piece left-over. And it's not just a question of mayeb getting a sign wrong in one diagram, or a factor of 2 off...no mater how much I would fudge any coefficient of the terms I get, there is no way to get this piece to go away. By the way, I have done and checked the one-loop correction to the scalar particles, so I don't think I am missing something really obvious (but who knows!).

Has anyone done this calculation or seen some details provided in some reference??

Thanks in advance,

Patrick
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K