Measuring Ionization Energy of Candles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the ionization energy produced by candles, concluding that candle flames lack sufficient energy to ionize atoms or molecules. A typical candle emits approximately 77 watts of combined light and heat, with about 40 watts attributed to heat and 0.2 watts to light. The combustion of paraffin wax releases around 42 kJ of energy per gram, and the power output of candles varies, with estimates ranging from 60 W for tealights to 100 W for pillar candles. The conversation clarifies that while candles produce light and heat, they do not generate ionization energy in significant amounts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combustion processes and energy release
  • Familiarity with photometric and radiometric units
  • Knowledge of ionization and plasma physics
  • Basic principles of candle chemistry and materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ionization process in gases and its energy requirements
  • Explore the combustion chemistry of paraffin wax and its energy output
  • Learn about photometric and radiometric conversions in lighting
  • Investigate the effects of electric fields on ionization in gases
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in combustion science, physicists studying ionization processes, and anyone interested in the energy dynamics of candle flames.

Tominator
Messages
77
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I have been wondering how much energy does a candle produce per second. I know, that the heat energy can be measured, but what about the ionization energy? By ionization energy I mean the energy which is consumed when neutral atoms in the air are ionized.
How can the amount of ions generated by candle per second be counted?

Thanks for answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Candle flames are not energetic enough to ionize atoms. Perhaps confusingly, the light output by a single candle is given by the unit 'candela':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candela

A candle emits about 1/683 W per steradian; an isotropically emitting candle emits about 0.2 W.
 
According to the wiki on candles, a typical candle emits a combined total (light and heat) of about 77 watts:
A modern candle typically burns at a rate of about 0.1 g/min, releasing heat of about 77 W, plus or minus about 9 W.[2] The light produced is about 13 lumens. The luminous efficacy is about 0.17 lumens per watt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candle

...though, unless I'm missing something it doesn't quite jive with another part of the article:
A candle typically produces about 13 lumens of visible light and 40 watts of heat, although this can vary depending primarily on the characteristics of the candle wick.
 
russ_watters said:
According to the wiki on candles, a typical candle emits a combined total (light and heat) of about 77 watts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candle

...though, unless I'm missing something it doesn't quite jive with another part of the article:

Ah... photometric units.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumen_(unit )

1 lm = 1 cd*sr, so an isotropic candle emits 4*pi lm ~ 13 lm. Converting photometric (lm, lx, phot, nit..) units to radiometric (W, J, W/cm^2...) units is an exercise in frustration, but converting luminance to radiance can kinda-sorta be done by the NIST conversion I gave above. The candle article you quote gives the same conversion, but they left out the fact that the conversion occurs at the maximum response of the model human eye. Band-averaged over the spectrum, 13 lm will give less than 13* 0.17 W.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, good to know where your number comes from. To clarify, though, the OP didn't ask how much light a candle produces, but rather asked how much energy it produces. So it would be on the order of 40 or 77 watts total, 38.8 or 76.8 of which as heat and the other .2 as light.
 
Actually, if you want to pick nits, the OP asked how many ions a candle produces, and how much energy is associated with the ionization process.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Actually, if you want to pick nits, the OP asked how many ions a candle produces, and how much energy is associated with the ionization process.

Exactly
Thanks for answering my first question. Andy, you have claimed in your first post that
Andy Resnick said:
Candle flames are not energetic enough to ionize atoms. Perhaps confusingly, the light output by a single candle is given by the unit 'candela': ...

According to my knowledge, plasma is ionized gas and candle flame is plasma... also if you put a candle between two charged plates, the flame divides into two ion streams. So if flame does not ionize the air around candle, what does?
 
Candles produce light and heat by combustion, which is an electrically neutral process, AFAIK. The soot, on the other hand, can apparently pick up charges from the air. I am not sure how this occurs.

The bottom line, a candle flame is not energetic enough to ionize atoms or molecules. Proof of this is the fact that candles don't produce UV or X-ray radiation.
 
Andy Resnick said:
Candles produce light and heat by combustion, which is an electrically neutral process, AFAIK. The soot, on the other hand, can apparently pick up charges from the air. I am not sure how this occurs.

The bottom line, a candle flame is not energetic enough to ionize atoms or molecules. Proof of this is the fact that candles don't produce UV or X-ray radiation.

So those ion streams generated when a candle is between charged plates are primarily caused by the voltage difference? But the heat makes the ionization process easyer, doesn`t it? (lower voltage is required)
 
  • #10
The combustion of paraffin wax releases about 42 kJ of energy per gram. Assuming that a candle combusts 100% of its wax (none is lost as unburnt vapour etc.) then the power output of such a candle = rate of energy released from combustion.

I've had a look at various paraffin candles on the internet and compared their claimed burn times with the estimated mass of wax they comprise. I got figures which varied between about 60 W for the slowest-burning tealights and 100 W for the brightest pillar candles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K