- #1

zenterix

- 515

- 74

- Homework Statement
- I am a bit confused by the following concepts when we analyze them together:

- electron affinity

- electronegativity

- ionization energy

I will illustrate my doubts with the following problem

Consider the KF molecule, which has an ionic bond. The bond length is ##2.17\cdot 10^{-10}##m.

(a) Calculate the energy required to dissociate the KF molecule into the ions ##K^+## and ##F^-##.

(b) The energy required to dissociate KF into neutral atoms is 498 kJ/mol. Given that the first ionization energy for K is 418 kJ/mol, calculate the electron affinity (in kJ/mol) for F.

- Relevant Equations
- It seems that one way to calculate the dissociation energy of a KF molecule is to use classical electromagnetism. We consider each nucleus as a point charge and calculate the potential energy of the system composed of these two charges..

$$U(r)=k_e\frac{Z_1Z_2e^2}{r}=\frac{(+1)\cdot(-1)\cdot 1.602\cdot 10^{-19}}{2.17\cdot 10^{-10}} J$$

$$-1.06\cdot 10^{-18} J$$

$$=-640 kJ/mol$$

What this means is that to bring together these two ions it takes ##1.06\cdot 10^{-18} J## of work by the electrostatic forces involved. Similarly, to bring them infinitely far apart, the electrostatic forces involved do the negative of this amount of work, and whatever force is bringing the charges apart does ##1.06\cdot 10^{-18} J## of work.

Now, apparently, this all means that when these ions are brought together, energy is released. In fact, I do see that the final potential energy is lower than the initial potential energy, so difference had to go somewhere (though this still feels very imprecise at this point).

Hence, the process of breaking the ionic bond is the opposite of creating the bond by bringing the ions together, and thus requires 640 kJ/mol.

Let's think now about the energy to create a KF molecule from neutral atoms.

First we need to ionize both K and F: K loses an electron and F gains an electron. Then we have to bring the ions together.

The first ionization energy of K is 418 kJ/mol and for F is 1681 kJ/mol. The electron affinity for F is 328 kJ/mol.

Thus, ##K(g)\to K^+(g)+e## and 418 kJ is required per mol of K for this to happen.

Also, ##F^-(g)+e\to F(g)## and 328 kJ is released per mol of F.

Hence, just to ionize a mol of each of these elements we need to supply 418-328=90 kJ/mol of energy.

Next, as we've calculated previously, to bring the two ions together releases 640 kJ/mol of KF.

Thus, the entire process of creating KF from neutral atoms requires (-640+90)=-550 kJ/mol. That is, energy is released in the formation of KF.

My first question is if the calculations above are correct?

Next, apparently the energy required to dissociate KF into neutral atoms is 498 kJ/mol. I assume this is the experimental measure, which differs from our expected value of 550 kJ/mol due to the fact that we treated the atoms as point charges and ignored quantum mechanics.

Is this explanation for the discrepancy correct?

To get from KF to neutral atoms we have the following equations

$$KF \to K^+ +F^-$$

$$K^++e\to K$$

$$F^-\to F+e$$

In the first equation 640 kJ/mol is provided to the system. In the second equation, I assume we have the reverse operation implicit in the concept of "ionization energy". That is, if it takes 418 kJ/mol to ionize K, then this amount is released from a system of ##K^++e## when we form the neutral K.

Finally, in the third equation I again assume we are dealing with the opposite of the concept implicity in electron affinity of F. That is, a certain energy ##EA_F## is released when we go from ##F+e## to ##F^-##, so I assume we have to provide ##EA_F## to ##F^-## to obtain the neutral F.

Thus we have that ##498=640-418+EA_F##

and thus

##EA_F=276 kJ/mol##

What I am looking for are pointers about how to think about these concepts. I believe the final answers above are correct (because I can see the final solutions on MIT OCW), but it is the process of obtaining these answers that has me thinking a lot about if I actually understand what is happening.

First we need to ionize both K and F: K loses an electron and F gains an electron. Then we have to bring the ions together.

The first ionization energy of K is 418 kJ/mol and for F is 1681 kJ/mol. The electron affinity for F is 328 kJ/mol.

Thus, ##K(g)\to K^+(g)+e## and 418 kJ is required per mol of K for this to happen.

Also, ##F^-(g)+e\to F(g)## and 328 kJ is released per mol of F.

Hence, just to ionize a mol of each of these elements we need to supply 418-328=90 kJ/mol of energy.

Next, as we've calculated previously, to bring the two ions together releases 640 kJ/mol of KF.

Thus, the entire process of creating KF from neutral atoms requires (-640+90)=-550 kJ/mol. That is, energy is released in the formation of KF.

My first question is if the calculations above are correct?

Next, apparently the energy required to dissociate KF into neutral atoms is 498 kJ/mol. I assume this is the experimental measure, which differs from our expected value of 550 kJ/mol due to the fact that we treated the atoms as point charges and ignored quantum mechanics.

Is this explanation for the discrepancy correct?

To get from KF to neutral atoms we have the following equations

$$KF \to K^+ +F^-$$

$$K^++e\to K$$

$$F^-\to F+e$$

In the first equation 640 kJ/mol is provided to the system. In the second equation, I assume we have the reverse operation implicit in the concept of "ionization energy". That is, if it takes 418 kJ/mol to ionize K, then this amount is released from a system of ##K^++e## when we form the neutral K.

Finally, in the third equation I again assume we are dealing with the opposite of the concept implicity in electron affinity of F. That is, a certain energy ##EA_F## is released when we go from ##F+e## to ##F^-##, so I assume we have to provide ##EA_F## to ##F^-## to obtain the neutral F.

Thus we have that ##498=640-418+EA_F##

and thus

##EA_F=276 kJ/mol##

What I am looking for are pointers about how to think about these concepts. I believe the final answers above are correct (because I can see the final solutions on MIT OCW), but it is the process of obtaining these answers that has me thinking a lot about if I actually understand what is happening.