Cannot do the integral of the Hyper-geometric function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inability of Mathematica to compute the integral of the hypergeometric function ##\int_0^\infty dx~x~_2F_1(a,b,c,1-x-x^2)##, while it successfully evaluates ##\int_0^\infty dx~x~_2F_1(a,b,c,1-x^2)##. Participants conclude that the second integral likely cannot be solved analytically. They recommend consulting Rydzik and Gradshteyn for further insights on this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hypergeometric functions, specifically ##_2F_1##.
  • Familiarity with Mathematica version 12.3 or later for computational capabilities.
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly improper integrals.
  • Access to reference texts such as Rydzik and Gradshteyn for advanced mathematical functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of hypergeometric functions.
  • Explore advanced integral techniques in Mathematica.
  • Study the reference material by Rydzik and Gradshteyn for deeper insights into complex integrals.
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating integrals that cannot be solved analytically.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in applied mathematics, and anyone interested in advanced integral calculus and hypergeometric functions.

Chenkb
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
Dear friends:
It's strange that Mathematica can do the integral of ##\int_0^\infty dx~x~_2F_1(a,b,c,1-x^2)##, however, fails when it's changed to ##\int_0^\infty dx~x~_2F_1(a,b,c,1-x-x^2)##.
Are there any major differences between this two types? Is it possible to do the second kind of integral?
Best regards!

hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=1622399897522260714&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.jpg
 

Attachments

  • hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=1622399897522260714&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.jpg
    hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=1622399897522260714&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 656
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't believe that that particular integral can be solved analytically. Best place to look is in Rydzik and Gradstien (sp)...
 
Dr Transport said:
I don't believe that that particular integral can be solved analytically. Best place to look is in Rydzik and Gradstien (sp)...
Many thanks! That reference is excellent!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K