Simplifying integral of Gauss' hypergeometric function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of an integral involving the Gauss hypergeometric function. Participants explore methods to simplify the integral and seek potential closed forms or numerical approaches for specific parameter values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is evaluating the integral numerically using Mathematica and inquires about expressing it in a form found in the Table of Integrals.
  • Another participant suggests a resource that may provide an answer, specifically for a case where α = 0.
  • A participant clarifies that their integral's last term is different from what was suggested, noting that a change of variables would alter the limits of integration and that no integral formula exists for the modified limits.
  • It is proposed that using an analytic result for part of the integral and then integrating numerically over a smaller range might be more efficient.
  • Questions are raised regarding the rapid decrease of coefficients in the hypergeometric series and how many terms would need to be evaluated for sufficient precision.
  • One participant provides specific values for the parameters a1, a2, and a3, indicating that a4 varies in a loop while a5 remains constant.
  • Another participant expresses interest in seeing numerical examples of the coefficients A_n from the hypergeometric series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of a closed form for the integral with arbitrary limits, and multiple approaches to the problem are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the applicability of existing integral formulas and the behavior of the hypergeometric series coefficients, which may affect the evaluation of the integral.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello all,

I have this integral, and currently I'm evaluating it using Mathematica numerically, which takes time to be evaluated. Can I write it in a way that the integral has a formula in the Table of Integrals?

\int_0^{\infty} F\left(a_1,a_2;a_3;a_4-a_5x\right) e^{-x}\,dx

where ##\{a_i\}_{i=1}^5## are constants, and ##F(.,.;.;) = _2F_1(.,.;.;.)## is the Gauss Hypergeometric function.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The last term in my formula is ##a_4-a_5t## not ##-t##! I tried change of variables, but the limits of integral will change, and there is no integral formula for it.
 
It might save some time to use this analytic result and integrate the rest (from the changed limits) numerically, as the function does not change that much in this smaller range.

If the help page only gives a result for the integral from 0 to infinity, then I guess a closed form for arbitrary limits does not exist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EngWiPy
S_David said:
\int_0^{\infty} F\left(a_1,a_2;a_3;a_4-a_5x\right) e^{-x}\,dx

Are the coefficients of your hypergeometric series decreasing rapidly ?
##A_n = \frac{ (a_1)_n (a_2)_n} {(a_3)_n n!} ##

How many terms of the series ##\sum_{k=0}^\infty (\int_0^\infty A_k (a_4 - a_5 x)^k e^{-x} dx ) ## would we have to evaluate to get the precision you need ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are the coefficients of your hypergeometric series decreasing rapidly ?
##A_n = \frac{ (a_1)_n (a_2)_n} {(a_3)_n n!} ##

How many terms of the series ##\sum_{k=0}^\infty (\int_0^\infty A_k (a_4 - a_5 x)^k e^{-x} dx ) ## would we have to evaluate to get the precision you need ?

I have ##a_1=2##, ##a_2=1##, and ##a_3=3##, while ##a_4## changes in a loop. ##a_5## is also constant, but set at the beginning of the simulation.
 
S_David said:
I have ##a_1=2##, ##a_2=1##, and ##a_3=3##, while ##a_4## changes in a loop. ##a_5## is also constant, but set at the beginning of the simulation.

Then let's have you or some other forum member post some examples of the numerical values of ##A_n##. As for me, tonight I'm busy trying to figure out how to use FreeCad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K