Canonical ensemble of a simplified DNA representation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the canonical partition function for a simplified DNA representation involving N-particle strands that can form double helices or remain open. The energy states are defined based on whether the strands are open or closed, with an energy cost of ##\epsilon## for open links. The partition function is expressed as ##Z(\beta, V, N) = \{exp[-\beta \epsilon]\}^m##, where ##m## represents the number of open links. The participants clarify the base equation for the partition function and the manipulations leading to the final expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical ensemble concepts in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with partition functions and their significance
  • Basic knowledge of energy states in molecular systems
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation related to summations and exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of open and closed states in molecular chains
  • Study the role of energy states in the behavior of DNA strands
  • Investigate the relationship between canonical ensembles and thermodynamic properties
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in statistical mechanics, physicists studying molecular systems, and anyone interested in the thermodynamic properties of DNA representations.

zexxa
Messages
32
Reaction score
7
Question
Form the canoncial partition using the following conditions:

  • 2 N-particles long strands can join each other at the i-th particle to form a double helix chain.
  • Otherwise, the i-th particle of each strand can also be left unattached, leaving the chain "open"
  • An "open" link gives the strand ##\epsilon## amount of energy where ##\epsilon > 0##
  • A "closed" link gives the strand no energy
  • For ##m < N##, the strand must be "open" for ##i \leq m## and "closed" for ##m < i \leq N##
  • Note that ##m \neq N##
  • Each particle are independent of each other and they weakly interact

Attempt

I treated the energy states at ##i /leq m## and ## i > m## as a simple one energy state i.e.
## E = \sum_i ^N n_i \epsilon , {n_i} = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if $i \leq m$}.\\
0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}##
Therefore,
##Z(\beta , V , N) = \{ exp[ - \beta \epsilon ] \} ^m \{ exp[ 0 ]\} ^{N-m} = exp[ - \beta \epsilon ] ^m##

Does this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zexxa said:
Does this make sense?
No. What is the base equation for the partition function?
 
The base equation?
## Z ( \beta, V, N) = \sum_\alpha exp[ -\beta E ] = \sum_\alpha exp [ -\beta \sum_i^N n_i \epsilon ]
= \sum_\alpha exp [ -\beta m \epsilon]
= \{exp[ -\beta \epsilon ]\}^m
= exp [-\beta \epsilon] ^m##

The base equation is the first 2 equations, and the rest are the manipulations I did to get to my answer from before.
 
zexxa said:
## Z ( \beta, V, N) = \sum_\alpha exp[ -\beta E ] = \sum_\alpha exp [ -\beta \sum_i^N n_i \epsilon ]
= \sum_\alpha exp [ -\beta m \epsilon]
= \{exp[ -\beta \epsilon ]\}^m
= exp [-\beta \epsilon] ^m##
I don't understand how you got from the 4th to the 5th terms in there. Also, shouldn't there be a link between ##\alpha## and ##m##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K