I Canonical transformation vs symplectomorphism

AI Thread Summary
Canonical transformations are essentially symplectomorphisms that preserve the symplectic form, with interpretations as either passive (changing coordinate labels) or active (mapping points). The discussion raises a question about whether symplectomorphisms can map points outside a given coordinate chart and how to interpret such transformations. It is clarified that, in practice, one can always find a chart that includes both the original and transformed points, as long as the phase space is connected. Concerns about using different charts for transformations are acknowledged, but it is noted that transition functions can still be relevant. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the relationship between canonical transformations and symplectomorphisms.
lriuui0x0
Messages
101
Reaction score
25
I have read that canonical transformation is basically a symplectomorphism which leaves the symplectic form invariant. My understanding is that the canonical transformation is a passive picture where we keep the point on the phase space fixed and change the coordinate chart, where symplectomorphism is the active picture where we map the point to a different point using the same chart.

My question is couldn't symplectomorphism map a point outside of a chart? How do we make sense of such transformation as a coordinate change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's true that canonical transformations ##f## preserve the symplectic 2-form ##\omega## in the sense that ##f^* \omega = \omega## (that's the defining feature of such a transformation!). What does the question mean?
lriuui0x0 said:
My question is couldn't symplectomorphism map a point outside of a chart?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
I have read that canonical transformation is basically a symplectomorphism which leaves the symplectic form invariant. My understanding is that the canonical transformation is a passive picture where we keep the point on the phase space fixed and change the coordinate chart, where symplectomorphism is the active picture where we map the point to a different point using the same chart.

Citation please?

Usually, what I've read is that a canonical transformation can be interpreted in a pasive way (you are changing the label of the points) or in an active way (you are moving the points). Both are canonical transformations.

The same way that a rotation can be understood by saying that the points are fixed and the coordinate axes are rotating, or by saying that the points are rotating and the axes are fixed. They are both a rotation (and rotations are CT, btw).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
andresB said:
Usually, what I've read is that a canonical transformation can be interpreted in a pasive way (you are changing the label of the points) or in an active way (you are moving the points). Both are canonical transformations.

I'm just trying to understand in what sense symplectomorphism is canonical transformation. My understanding is the following. When you have a symplectomorphism, that's an active picture of the transformation which maps a point on the phase space to a different point. If we have a coordinate chart that contains both the old and the new point, we see the new point will have a new set of coordinate values. This is how I translate the symplectomorphism to coordinate language, which I think is the active canonical transformation you talked about.

Now what happens if this function maps a point outside of the range of a chart? If this is the case, there's no common chart that contains both the old point and the new point, how do I know about the coordinate changes?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
Now what happens if this function maps a point outside of the range of a chart? If this is the case, there's no common chart that contains both the old point and the new point, how do I know about the coordinate changes?
It is not something I've encountered in practice. But in any case, your phase space should be equipped with an atlas. If your point goes outside a given chart, you just use a different chart (from the same atlas) to label it.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
andresB said:
It is not something I've encountered in practice. But in any case, your phase space should be equipped with an atlas. If your point goes outside a given chart, you just use a different chart (from the same atlas) to label it.
Hmmm... I fee it's weird that the old & new coordinates are described by different charts, since they are completely not comparable that way. The transformation between the coordinates would not reflect the symplectomorphism itself, but also a random chart transition function.

So is the answer basically "you can always find a chart containing ##x## and ##f(x)## for the symplectomorphism ##f## that's worth considering"?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
Hmmm... I fee it's weird that the old & new coordinates are described by different charts, since they are completely not comparable that way. The transformation between the coordinates would not reflect the symplectomorphism itself, but also a random chart transition function.

So is the answer basically "you can always find a chart containing ##x## and ##f(x)## for the symplectomorphism ##f## that's worth considering"?

Well, yes. Given x and f(x) there is always a chart that contains both (as long as the phase space is connected)

But I also don't understand your objections to using transition functions.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

Back
Top