Can't Understand the Solution of Landau-Lifschitz Mechanics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter gobbles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 12K views
gobbles
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
I'm going over Landau Lifschitz vol. 1, solving selected problems and I can't understand how to arrive at the correct solution of this one (question (part b) + solution of relevant question attached).

I did arrive at the correct expressions of the coordinates of the point m, but I can't get to the solution. What I'm doing is taking the derivative of x and y, adding their squares together to get v2 and then the kinetic energy and subtracting the potential energy from that, which is just -y times mg, but I don't get the correct answer. Please help.
 

Attachments

  • Question.JPG
    Question.JPG
    25.3 KB · Views: 1,513
Physics news on Phys.org
Just noticed that the question is missing.
It is to find the Lagrangian of the system.
 
The answer looks wrong to me. The first term should be phi_dot^2 -- the units aren't even correct. For the 2nd term, I get the cos and sin switched and a factor of phi_dot in place of one alpha. I guess I'm as confused as you are...
 
I am stuck on this problem as well. I ended up with the same solution as mistergrinch. Surely there must be someone out there who has encountered this problem in such a famous text. I feel I am missing something small but important. Any help would be appreciated. :smile:
 
The total derivatives are omitted from the Lagrangian.

The second term of the square of [itex]\dot{x}[/itex] which should be

-maγlsin(γt)cosφ[itex]\dot{\varphi}[/itex]

can be written as

d/dt{-maγl sin(γt) (sin(φ)}+maγ2lcos(γt)sin(φ), and the derivative with respect time is omitted.


ehild
 
It took me some time to find it out. The missing dot in the first term is a typo in your copy: The dot is present in the original Russian edition.

ehild
 
Can you explain how you go from one term to the other? I'm taking a graduate level classical mechanics course, even though my physics background is limited, but my math background goes through ODE's. I suppose I am getting as far as the others were, but if you could explain why or how we know what you said it would help extremely