Capacitance after changing plate distances

  • Thread starter Thread starter exitwound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Plate
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1
1. Homework Statement , from my crappy textbook

problem.jpg


2. Homework Equations barely explained in my crappy textbook

Q=CV
[itex]C=\epsilon A/d[/itex]

3. The Attempt at a Solution that should be easy but the textbook is crap

Before squeezing:
Simplify the circuit by combining the two capacitors in parallel:

[itex]C_{12}=C_1 + C_2[/itex]
[itex]C_{12}=7x10^-6 + 7x10^-6 = 14x10^-6 F[/itex]

[itex]Q=CV[/itex]
[itex]Q=C_{12}V[/itex]
[itex]Q=(14x10^-6)(24)=3.36x10^-4 C[/itex]

After Squeezing:
[itex]C=\epsilon A/d[/itex]
[itex]2C=\epsilon A/(d/2)[/itex]
[itex]C=(7x10^-6)(2)=14x10^-6 F[/itex]

[itex]C_{12}=14x10^-6 + 7x10^-6 = 21x10^-6 F[/itex]
[itex]Q=(21x10^-6)(24)=5.04x10^-4 C[/itex]

Am I even close?

At this point, I have absolutely no idea what the problem is asking. Did I mention this book is terrible? Aren't both questions asking the exact same thing?? This is ridiculous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way it is worded it appears as if a.) and b.) are the same question.
Your work looks right. Remember its asking for an increase so subtract before squeezing value from after squeezing value.
 
That's what I did, but the answer was wrong.
 
Anyone? Still no go on this one.
 
Ah Hmmm... b.) could be a trick question... total charge (+ plus -) is of course zero.
But your calculations are correct for what they find. Parallel capacitances add. Halving the separation doubles the capacitance. That's it.