Capacitance Q: Connected in Series/Parallel? Charge on Plates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of capacitors when connected in series or parallel, specifically focusing on the charge distribution on the plates of the capacitors. Participants explore the implications of different configurations and the resulting charge dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question how the capacitors are connected and what happens to the charge on the plates when connected in parallel. There is exploration of charge flow between plates and the implications of potential differences.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of charge distribution and potential differences. Some participants suggest using conservation of charge, while others express confusion about the initial and final states of the capacitors. Guidance has been offered regarding charge distribution and potential equality.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of assumptions regarding the equivalence of capacitors and the effects of doubling the plate area. Participants also express uncertainty about returning to the original configuration and the implications of charge on different surfaces of the capacitors.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


105qj6a.jpg

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have any idea on this.
Firstly, how are the capacitors connected? are they in series or parallel?
What happens to the charge on plates of first capacitor when the capacitors are connected in parallel?

Any help is appreciated. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The capacitors connected means that both plates of the first one are connected to the plates of the other one.

Note that charges can go from one plate to the other if the plates are connected.

At the end, the connected plates are at the same potential.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The capacitors connected means that both plates of the first one are connected to the plates of the other one.

Note that charges can go from one plate to the other if the plates are connected.

At the end, the connected plates are at the same potential.

ehild

So that means they are connected in parallel, right?

Here are different charges on both the plates of first capacitor, so i don't understand how the charge will flow, i mean how much charge will the second capacitor gain or lose? :confused:
 
Assuming the capacitors are equivalent, can you see any difference between them at the end?
You get a single capacitor, with twice as big plates as the original ones.
Find out the charge distribution. Are there charges only on the inside of the capacitor? Or are charges also on the outer surfaces of the plates?

ehild
 
ehild said:
Assuming the capacitors are equivalent, can you see any difference between them at the end?
You get a single capacitor, with twice as big plates as the original ones.
Find out the charge distribution. Are there charges only on the inside of the capacitor? Or are charges also on the outer surfaces of the plates?

ehild

Charges will be on both the surfaces.
Increasing the area will increase the capacity, but how can i find the charge distribution?

You said that they will at the same potential at the end. So can i use the conservation of charge method? If yes, how will i find the initial charge?
 
The resultant capacitor has got 4Q charge on one plate and -2Q charge on the other plate. The size of the plates is twice the original area. The charge distribution should be even at the end.
The whole system has got 2Q excess charge. That excess charge distributes evenly on the outer surfaces. The potential difference between the plates is obtained from the charge of the inner surfaces.
ehild
 
ehild said:
The resultant capacitor has got 4Q charge on one plate and -2Q charge on the other plate. The size of the plates is twice the original area. The charge distribution should be even at the end.
The whole system has got 2Q excess charge. That excess charge distributes evenly on the outer surfaces. The potential difference between the plates is obtained from the charge of the inner surfaces.

ehild

Can we get back to the original situation when the area is not doubled because i am getting confused, please?
So the charge on the outer surfaces of the first capacitor is Q and on the inner surfaces is 3Q and -3Q, am i right?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Can we get back to the original situation when the area is not doubled because i am getting confused, please?
So the charge on the outer surfaces of the first capacitor is Q and on the inner surfaces is 3Q and -3Q, am i right?

Yes.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Yes.

ehild

Thanks! So my next step would be equating final and initial charges?

3Q=CV+CV
(V is the common potential at the end)
From here i get V=3Q/2C.

Is my answer right?
 
  • #10
Yes, it is correct.

ehild
 
  • #11
ehild said:
Yes, it is correct.

ehild

Thank you once again! :smile:
 
  • #12
You are always welcome :smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K