Capacitor in Series and Parallel combination

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent capacitance of a network of capacitors arranged in both series and parallel configurations. The original poster expresses confusion about identifying series and parallel arrangements in a complex circuit involving multiple capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the arrangement of capacitors, questioning how to determine if capacitors are in series or parallel. There are attempts to clarify the placement of equivalent capacitors after combining them, and discussions about the connections between nodes in the circuit.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the relationships between capacitors in the circuit. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions for series and parallel connections, but there remains uncertainty and differing interpretations about specific configurations.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific nodes and connections in the circuit that are critical for understanding the arrangement of the capacitors. The original poster and others are grappling with the implications of these connections on the overall circuit behavior.

carnot cycle
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the equivalent capacitance for the network between points A and B.

Homework Equations


1/(Ceq) = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3... (series)
Ceq = C1 + C2 + C3... (parallel)
C1 = 6.9 nF
C2 = 4.6 nF

The Attempt at a Solution


I have been getting stuck on a lot of these questions. A few issues I'm having:

1) Not being able to decide if a capacitor is in series or parallel for complex problems like these that involve both.
2) Not knowing where to place an equivalent capacitor after I have combined two or three capacitors.

For this problem, I started by combining the three C1 capacitors on the right side of the problem that are in series with one another.

However, after this, I was unable to decide which are in series or parallel. I am unsure if the two C2 capacitors are in parallel with the equivalent capacitor that I have found after combining the three C1 capacitors that are in series with one another.

Any help/problem solving strategies are greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 2,017
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you not see that the three right-most C1 capacitors in series are in parallel with the right-most C2?
C1/3 is in parallel with C2?
 
Yes I see that, but why is it not also parallel to the left most C2 capacitor?

EDIT: Also, how did you know to place the C1/3 equivalent capacitor such that it is parallel to the C2?
 
carnot cycle said:
Yes I see that, but why is it not also parallel to the left most C2 capacitor?
Because it's not connected to that C2; there are a pair of C1 capacitors between the nodes where the C1/3 connects and the nodes where that C2 connects. For components to be connected in parallel they must be wired to each other without any other components in between (in the wiring).
EDIT: Also, how did you know to place the C1/3 equivalent capacitor such that it is parallel to the C2?

Because the three series C1 capacitors were connected there before (nodes c and d in the diagram), and the C1/3 equivalent capacitor just replaces them.
 
So does this mean that the two C1 capacitors between nodes A and C are also in parallel?
 
carnot cycle said:
So does this mean that the two C1 capacitors between nodes A and C are also in parallel?

No! They don't both share the same two nodes. Each of them has an open connection (node a, node b) and there's a C2 (and other stuff in parallel with that C2) in between their other connections.

For two components to be in parallel they must share the same potential difference. That is, they must each be connected to the same pair of nodes.
 
carnot cycle said:
So does this mean that the two C1 capacitors between nodes A and C are also in parallel?

To review:
1. let
C2r = right-hand C2
C2l = left-hand C2

then
C2r → C2r' after combining with three C1 in series
C2l → C2l' after combining with C2r' and two C1's
C1 + C2l' + C1 are then in series across a and b.
 
carnot cycle said:
EDIT: Also, how did you know to place the C1/3 equivalent capacitor such that it is parallel to the C2?

The equivalent capacitor is connected to the same place (see red dots)...

This shows the first two steps only. The process repeats. If you look at the right hand side of the bottom drawing you can see it's similar to the right hand side of the top drawing.
 

Attachments

  • Caps.png
    Caps.png
    17.4 KB · Views: 768
Last edited:
Thanks everyone for the help! I've tried a few more problems and seem to be able to solve them now.
 
  • #10
Well just when I thought I understood these types of problems, I came across one that has left me confused for a while :(

The textbook states that when the switch is closed, the two capacitors shown are connected in parallel. However, I don't understand why they are connected in parallel, and not in series. Aren't the left side and right side of the circuit just connected together when the switch is closed?

The center part of the switch is an insulating handle.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 634
  • #11
The general rule (for components with two terminals) is that:

They are in series if both components share one common node with each other, but no other component.

They are in parallel if they share two common nodes.

In this case the two capacitors will be connected to each other at both terminals so they are considered to be in parallel.

See also..

http://www.ee.buffalo.edu/faculty/paololiu/edtech/roaldi/References/sp.htm
 

Attachments

  • Caps.png
    Caps.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 667

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K