Normally, you need how system transforms n basis vectors to say how it transforms arbitrary vector. For instance, when your signal is presented in fourier basis, you need to know how system responds to every sine. But, I have noted that it is not true for the simplest standard basis. You just measure or compute a single Impulse Response (green's function?), for input <1000...> and you already know the responses for all other basis vectors: <0100...>, <0010...> and etc. You use it in convolution. How it is possible?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Indeed, the delta-impulse, if you take its Fourier transform, is a combination of sines of constant amplitude. It is <111111...> in the Fourier basis. But, all sines are entangled here. So, instead of measuring response for every separate sine, we can measure response for all sines at once. Then, we can project the response to every separate sine and, thus, figure out the response per every separate sine. Is it right?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Capturing n basis vectors by single one

Loading...

Similar Threads - Capturing basis vectors | Date |
---|---|

I Diagonalization and change of basis | Jan 16, 2018 |

I Measures of Linear Independence? | Dec 14, 2017 |

B Tensor Product, Basis Vectors and Tensor Components | Nov 24, 2017 |

A Find vectors in Orthogonal basis set spanning R4 | Mar 2, 2017 |

Variance captured in coordinate axis. | Jul 26, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**